Finite Element Model Updating of Senyuva Historical Arch Bridge Using Ambient Vibration Tests

Alemdar Bayraktar, Fatma Birinci, Ahmet Can Altunışık, Temel Türker, Barış Sevim


This paper describes a historical arch bridge; its analytical modelling, modal testing and finite element model (FEM) updating. For this purpose, Senyuva historical arch bridge which is built in 1696 and located in Camlihemsin, Rize, Turkey, is selected as an application. 3D FEM of the bridge is modelled using ANSYS software to obtain analytical dynamic characteristics such as natural frequencies and mode shapes. Then, operational modal analysis using ambient vibrations is performed to attain dynamic characteristics experimentally. Human walking and wind are used as natural excitation. The output-only modal parameter identification is carried out using the Peak Picking method in frequency domain and the Stochastic Subspace Identification method in time domain. After, analytically and experimentally identified dynamic characteristics compared with each other and FEM of the historical bridge is updated to minimize the differences between modal parameters by changing uncertain modelling parameters such as boundary conditions. As a result, differences between the natural frequencies are reduced from 27% to 3% and good agreement is found between analytical and experimental dynamic characteristics after FEM updating.


ambient vibration; dynamic characteristics; finite element model (FEM) updating; historical arch bridge; modal testing; operational modal analysis

Full Text:



Bayraktar, A.; Altunışık, A. C.; Türker, T.; Sevim, B. 2007b. The Model Updating of Historical Masonry Bridges Using Operational Modal Analysis Method, in Proc of the 1st National Conference “Reinforcement and Transfer into the Future of Historical Structures”. Ed. by Karaesmen, E.; Unay, A. I.; Toktay, M.; Toptas, F. September 27–29, 2007, Ankara, Turkey. Ankara: Chamber of Civil Engineering, 429–440.

Bayraktar, A.; Türker, T.; Sevim, B.; Altunisik, A. C. 2007a. Determination of Dynamic Characteristics of Steel Footbridges by Analytical and Experimental Modal Analyses, in Proc of the International Symposium “Advances in Earthquake and Structural Engineering”. Ed. by Baydar, M. L.; Motsonelidze, A.; Altay, G.; Gulkan, P.; Rekvava, P.; Javakhishvili, Z. October 24–26, 2007, Isparta, Turkey. Isparta: Suleyman Demirel University, 163–172.

Brencich, A.; Sabia, D. 2008. Experimental Identification of a Multi-Span Masonry Bridge: the Tanaro Bridge, Construction and Building Materials 22(10): 2087–2099. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.031

Brincker, R.; Zhang, L.; Andersen, P. 2000. Output-Only Modal Analysis by Frequency Domain Decomposition, in Proc of the International Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference on (ISMA-2000). 13–15 September, 2000, Leuven, Belgium [cited 09 January, 2009]. Available from Internet:

Dulinskas, E. J.; Gribniak, V.; Kaklauskas, G. 2008. Influence of Steam Curing on High-Cyclic Behaviour of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Elements, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(3): 115–120. DOI: 10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.115-120

Ewins, D. J. 1984. Modal Testing: Theory and Practice. Research Studies Press Ltd. 312 p. England. ISBN 0 86380 017 3.

Felber, A. J. 1993. Development of Hybrid Bridge Evaluation System. PhD thesis 2006. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. 299 p.

Frunzio, G.; Monaco, M.; Gesualdo, A. 2001. 3D FEM Analysis of a Roman Arch Bridge, in Proc of the Historical Constructions Conference. Ed. by Lourenço, P. B.; Roca, P. 10 October, 2001, Guimarăes, Portuguese [cited 13 January, 2009]. Available from Internet: .

Juang, J. N. 1994. Applied System Identification. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall Inc. 394 p. ISBN 9780130792112.

Juozapaitis, A.; Norkus, A.; Vainiūnas, P. 2008. Shape Stabilization of Steel Suspension Bridge, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(3): 137–144. DOI: 10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.137-144

Kliukas, R.; Kacianauskas, R; Jaras, A. 2008. A Monument of Historical Heritage − Vilnius Archcathedral Belfry: The Dynamic Investigation, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(2): 139–146. DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.9

Kudzys, A.; Kliukas, R. 2008. Limit State and Probabilistic Formats in the Analysis of Bracing Piers of Annular Cross-Sections, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(3): 167–173. DOI: 10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.167-173

Kudzys, A.; Kliukas, R. 2009. The Limit State Design of Spun Concrete Columns Using Load Combinations Recommended by EN 1990 and ASCE/SEI 7-05, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15(3): 289–297. DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.289-297

Mamaghani, I. H. P. 2006. Analysis of Masonry Bridges: Discrete Finite Element Method, Transportation Research Record 76(4): 13–19. DOI:10.3141/1976-04

Mazzolani, F. M.; Corte, G. D; D’Aniello, M. 2009. Experimental Analysis of Steel Dissipative Bracing Systems for Seismic Upgrading, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15(1): 7–19. DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.7-19

Peeters, B. 2000. System Identification and Damage Detection in Civil Engineering. PhD thesis 2000. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit. 256 p.

Peeters, B.; De Roeck, G. 2000. Reference Based Stochastic Subspace Identification in Civil Engineering, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering 8(1): 47–74. DOI: 10.1080/174159700088027718

Rainieri, C.; Fabbrocino, G.; Cosenza, E.; Manfredi, G. 2007. Implementation of OMA Procedures Using Labview: Theory and Application, in Proc of the 2nd International Operational Modal Analyses Conference. 30 April – 2 May, 2007, Copenhagen, Denmark [cited 12 January, 2009]. Available from Internet: <>.

Ren, W. X.; Zhao, T.; Harik, I. E. 2004. Experimental and Analytical Modal Analysis of Steel Arch Bridge, Journal of Structural Engineering 130(7): 1022–1031. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:7(1022)

Roeck, G. D.; Peeters, B.; Ren, W. X. 2000. Benchmark Study on System Identification Through Ambient Vibration Measurement, in Proc of the 18th International Conference “Modal Analysis”: selected papers, vol. 4062. Ed. by Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers; Society for Experimental Mechanics. February 2–5, 2000, San Antonio, USA. SPIE Proceedings Series, 1106–1112.

Sivilevicius, H.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2008. Quality Attributes and Complex Assessment Methodology of the Asphalt Mixing Plant, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(3): 161–166. DOI: 10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.161-166

Toker, S.; Unay, A. I. 2004. Mathematical Modelling and Finite Element Analysis of Masonry Arch Bridges, Journal of Science of Gazi University 17(2): 129–139.

Ural, A. 2005. Finite Element Analysis of Historical Arch Bridge, in Proc of the International Conference “Earthquake”. Ed. by Ozer, M. F.; Barıs, S.; Oztekin, K.; Konak, H. March 23–25, 2005, Kocaeli, Turkey. Kocaeli: Kocaeli University, 408–413.

Yu, D. J.; Ren, W. X. 2005. EMD-Based Stochastic Subspace Identification of Structures from Operational Vibration Measurements, Engineering Structures 27(12): 1741–1751. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.016

Zavadskas, E. K. 2008. Beginning the Fifth Decade of Development, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(4): 213–215. DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.19

Zavadskas, E. K.; Liias, R.; Turskis, Z. 2008. Multi-Attribute Decion-Making Methods for Assessment of Quality in Bridges and Road Construction: State-Of-The-Art Surveys, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(3): 152–160. DOI: 10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.152-160

DOI: 10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.177-185


1. The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges
Ahmet C. Altunisik, Burcu Kanbur, Ali F. Genc
Smart Structures and Systems  vol: 16  issue: 6  first page: 1069  year: 2015  
doi: 10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1069


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2009 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press Technika