Public Transport Integration Into Urban Planning

Authors

  • Marija Burinskienė Dept of Urban Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Rasa Ušpalytė-Vitkūnienė Dept of Urban Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Faustina Tuminienė Dept of Roads, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.11

Keywords:

urban planning, public transport system, modelling of public transport

Abstract

Growth of towns is a result of citizen’s social and physical division. Urban planners and scientists have increased the number of links between urban transport and urban development. Public transport has been in the focus of attention as a sustainable and environmentally sensitive transport that brings environmental benefit and possibility to serve mobility needs of citizens without private cars and reduces social division. The article identifies the main factors that affect the use of public transport in town: land use planning; local government policy; extent of economic resources; implementation of modern technologies; social tendencies. Analysis of the scientific literature has revealed four main models of towns of sustainable urban forms: neo-traditional development, urban restrictions, compact town and ecological town. Vilnius has the formed urban and mono-functional structure with a high imbalance between residential and work places which conditions a high mobility of inhabitants as well as high concentration of transport flows on limited-density street networks between the western residential areas and the central part of the City where the main workplaces are located. It presents the provisions of the Vilnius City Master Plan 2015 concerning the public transport improvement. The article also assesses developments in the public transport network in 2003–2009 resulting from changes in individual routes with regard to passenger time necessary for traveling. Modelling is carried out with the help of VISUM software. Citizens of Buivydiškės and Santariškės are mostly affected by the developments, while the situation in Pavilnys, Aukštieji Paneriai and Tarandė has changed only slightly.

References

Baldwin, H. D.; Brown, H.; Shoup, D. 2004. Waiting for the Bus, Journal of Public Transportation 7(4): 137–148.

Burinskienė, M. 2009. New Methodology for Sustainable Development Towards Sustainable Transportation System, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1): 5–9. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.5-9

Duff-Riddell, W. R.; Bester, C. J. 2005. Network Modeling Approach to Transit Network Design, Journal of Urban Planning and Development 131(2): 87−97. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:2(87)

Eliasson, J.; Mattsson, L. G. 2000. A model of Integrated Analysis of Household Location and Travel Choices, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 34(5): 375–394. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00038-5

Gillham, O. 2002. The Limitless City: A Primer on the Urban Sprawl Debate. Island Press. 328 p. ISBN 1559638338

Hensher, D. A.; Stanley, J. 2003. Performance-based Quality Contracts in Bus Service Provision, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 37(6): 519–538. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00006-5

Hensher, D. A.; Ton, T. 2002. A Transportation, Land Use and Environmental Strategy Impact Simulator for Urban Areas, Journal of Transportation 29(4): 439–457. doi:10.1023/A:1016335814417

Herala, N. 2003. Regulating Traffic with Land Use Planning, Sustainable Development 11(2): 91–102. doi:10.1002/sd.209

Hillman, M. 1996. In Favour of the Compact City, in The Compact City: a Sustainable Urban Form?. 1st edition. Routledge, 36–44. ISBN 0419213007.

Huwer, U. 2004. Public Transport and Car-sharing – Benefits and Effects of Combined Services, Transport Policy 11(1): 77−87. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.08.002

Krygsman, S.; Dijst, M.; Arentze, T. 2004. Multimodal Public Transport: an Analysis of Travel Time Elements and the Interconnectivity Ratio, Transport Policy 11(3): 265–275. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.12.001

Mesarec, B.; Lep, M. 2009.Combining the Grid-Based Spatial Planning and Network-based Transport Planning, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1): 60–77. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.60-77

Murray, A. T. 2001. Strategic Analysis of Public Transport Coverage, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35(3): 175−188.

Newman, P.; Kenworthy, J. 1989. Gasoline Consumption and Cities: a Comparison of U.S. Cities with a Global Survey and Some Implications, Journal of the American Planning Association 55(1): 24–37. doi:10.1080/01944368908975398

Pinto, C. C.; Pourbaix, J. 2007. Integration of Public Transport and Urban Planning: the Key to Sustainable Mobility, Public Transport International 5(2): 4–5.

Rudnicki, A. 1999. Kriteria i mierniki oceny miejskiej komunikacji zbiorowej [Criteria and Metrics for Evaluating Urban Public Transport]. Warsaw: IGKM. 126 p.

Shiftan, Y.; Kaplan, S.; Hakkert, Sh. 2003. Scenario Building as a Tool for Planning a Sustainable Transportation System, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 8(5): 323–342. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(03)00020-8

Stopher, P. R. 2004. Reducing Road Congestion: a Reality Check, Transport Policy 11(2): 117–131. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.09.002

Talen, E.; Ellis, C. 2002. Beyond Relativism: Reclaiming the Search for Good City Form, Journal of Planning Education and Research 22: 36–49. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202200104

Ušpalytė-Vitkūnienė, R.; Burinskienė, M. 2008. Integration of Public Transport and Urban Planning, in Proc. of the 7th International Conference “Environmental Engineering”: selected papers, vol. 3. Ed. By Čygas, D.; Froehner, K. D. May 22–23, 2008, Vilnius, Lithuania. Vilnius: Technika, 1075–1081.

Ušpalytė, R.; Burinskienė, M. 2004. A System of Indicators for the Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Development, in Conference “Environmental Education, Communication and Sustainability. Integrative Approaches Towards Sustainability in the Baltic Sea Region”. March 26–29, 2003, Jūrmala, Latvia. Frankfurt am Main, vol. 15: 333−343.

Vithlani, P. 1996. The Curitiba Model. Planning for Sustainable Cities. Lund: Dept of Social and Economic Geography, 41 p.

Wåhlberg, A. E. 2004. Characteristics of Low Speed Accidents with Buses in Public Transport: Part II, Accident Analysis and Prevention 36(1): 63–71. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00128-8

Waldo, Å. 1999. The Underlying Reasoning of Travel Behaviour, in Proc. of the International Conference “Urban Transport System” selected papers. June 7–8, 1999, Lund, Sweden. 34−44.

Downloads

Published

27.06.2011

How to Cite

Burinskienė, M., Ušpalytė-Vitkūnienė, R., & Tuminienė, F. (2011). Public Transport Integration Into Urban Planning. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 6(2), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.11