Mix Design With Low Bearing Capacity Materials

Authors

  • Gianluca Dell’Acqua Dept of Transportation Engineering “Luigi Tocchetti” University of Naples “Federico II” Via Claudio 21, I-80125 Naples, Italy
  • Mario De Luca Dept of Transportation Engineering “Luigi Tocchetti” University of Naples “Federico II” Via Claudio 21, I-80125 Naples, Italy
  • Francesca Russo Dept of Transportation Engineering “Luigi Tocchetti” University of Naples “Federico II” Via Claudio 21, I-80125 Naples, Italy
  • Renato Lamberti Dept of Transportation Engineering “Luigi Tocchetti” University of Naples “Federico II” Via Claudio 21, I-80125 Naples, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2012.28

Keywords:

Atterberg limits, low bearing capacity material, mixture, CBR and MDD index

Abstract

The roadway construction requirements for soils are generally fixed by standards. The most common constraints involving materials are Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), Max Dry Density (MDD) and bearing capacity predictable by using Proctor test and CBR test. These traditional tests are combined with other simple field tests to gain the max density. However, the use of low bearing materials such as clay and silt, and local resources is an important means of simplifying and economizing the road building still further. The main purpose of this experimental analysis is a procedure to characterize some road materials by its bearing capacity (CBR and MDD) from two simple standard tests (sieve analysis and Atterberg limits), and then a method to employ silt and/or clay in road mixture. The planned method suggests the minimal volume of high quality material in the roadway mixture added to silt and clay that must be available in the analyzed location, obtaining an ideal bearing capacity. Different soil types from various quarries and digs located in Southern Italy were used. The classic laboratory tests to assess the soil properties of all amassed study soils were carried out, i.e., the Atterberg limits and Grain Size Distribution (GSD). Correlations based on linear regression were then performed to determine the optimal combination of the properties measured with dependent CBR variables and Max Dry Density (MDD) to be predicted for low-volume roads. These equations were then validated by using four material types from outside the calibration sample.

References

Ahmed, A.; Khalid, H. 2009. Deformation Properties of Untreated and Enzyme-Treated Bottom Ash Waste for Use in Foundations, Transportation Research Record 2104: 97–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2014-11

Amšiejus, J.; Dirgėlienė, N.; Norkus, A.; Žilionienė, D. 2009. Evaluation of Soil Shear Strength Parameters via Triaxial Testing by Height Versus Diameter Ratio of Sample, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 4(2): 55–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.54-60

Berney IV, E. S.; Wahl, R. E. 2007. Rapid Soils Analysis Kit for Low-Volume Roads and Contingency Airfields, Transportation Research Record 1989: 71–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1989-50

Bloser, S. M. 2007. Commonly Used Aggregate Materials and Placement Methods: Comparative Analysis for a Wearing Course on Low-Volume Roads in Pennsylvania, Transportation Research Record 1989: 178–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1989-62

Dell’Acqua, G. 2011. Reducing Traffic Injuries Resulting from Excess Speed: Low-Cost Gateway Treatments in Italy, Transportation Research Record 2203: 94–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2203-12

Dell’Acqua, G.; Russo, F. 2011a. Road Performance Evaluation Using Geometric Consistency and Pavement Distress Data, Transportation Research Record 2203: 194–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2203-24

Dell’Acqua, G.; Russo, F. 2011b. Safety Performance Functions for Low-Volume Roads, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 6(4): 225–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.29

Dell’Acqua, G.; De Luca, M.; Lamberti, R. 2011. Indirect Skid Resistance Measurement for Porous Asphalt Pavement Management, Transportation Research Record 2205: 147–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2205-19

Discetti, P.; Dell’Acqua, G.; Lamberti, R. 2011. Models of Operating Speeds for Low-Volume Roads, Transportation Research Record 2203: 219–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2203-27

Jasiūnienė, V.; Čygas, D.; Ratkevičiūtė, K.; Peltola, H. 2012. Safety Ranking of the Lithuanian Road Network of National Significance, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 7(2): 129–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2012.18

Molenaar, A. 2007. Characterization of Some Tropical Soils for Road Pavements, Transportation Research Record 1989: 186–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1989-63

Pinard, M. I.; Obika, B.; Motswagole, K. J. 1999. Developments in Innovative Low-Volume Road Technology in Botswana, Transportation Research Record 1652: 68–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1652-09

Skrinskas, S.; Domatas, A. 2006. Analysis of Lithuanian Gravel Roads Paving Programme Implementation in 1998–2005, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 1(4): 157–166.

Siddiki, N. Z.; Kim, D.; Salgado, R. 2004. Use of Recycled and Waste Materials in Indiana, Transportation Research Record 1874: 78-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1874-09

Downloads

Published

27.09.2012

How to Cite

Dell’Acqua, G., De Luca, M., Russo, F., & Lamberti, R. (2012). Mix Design With Low Bearing Capacity Materials. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 7(3), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2012.28