Redefining Construction and Demolition Waste Management Systems: Best Practices on Civil Engineering Works

Paola Villoria Sáez; Ana de Guzmán Báez; Justo García Navarro; Mercedes del Río Merino

doi:10.3846/bjrbe.2014.22

Redefining Construction and Demolition Waste Management Systems: Best Practices on Civil Engineering Works

Authors

Paola Villoria Sáez Dept of Architectural Constructions and Control, School of Building Engineering, Technical University of Madrid, Avda. Juan de Herrera 6, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Ana de Guzmán Báez Dept of Agroforestry Engineering, School Agricultural Engineering, Technical University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Justo García Navarro Dept of Agroforestry Engineering, School Agricultural Engineering, Technical University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Mercedes del Río Merino Dept of Architectural Constructions and Control, School of Building Engineering, Technical University of Madrid, Avda. Juan de Herrera 6, 28040 Madrid, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.22

Keywords:

construction and demolition waste, waste management, best practices, waste minimization, civil engineering, railway works, quality management systems

Abstract

The civil engineering sector has to assume among its aims the reduction of the construction and demolition waste generated by it. To this end, foreseeing the amount of construction and demolition waste to be generated, as well as the time phase in which they might be produced, will allow for planning good environmental practices on site, both in a general way – for all the waste – as for each individual category of waste. The aim of this research paper is to determine the major categories of construction and demolition waste produced in railway construction works, and the construction stages where they are mainly generated. At the same time, a Best Practices Manual including a relation of best practices for on-site waste management is proposed and could be included in the Internal Quality System of the companies. Results of this study show that establishing and implementing a Best Practices Manual in engineering works for the phases of construction of tunnels, preliminary works and ground movement involves the management and minimization of almost 95% of the total waste generated. In addition, integrating the Report and Management Plan of construction and demolition waste together with the Best Practices Manual, promotes the environmental management of the company, favouring the cohesion of the construction process organization at all stages giving rise to establishing responsibilities in the field of waste and providing a greater control over the process.

References

Begum, R. A.; Siwar, C.; Pereira, J. J.; Jaafar, A. H. 2009. Attitude and Behavioral Factors in Waste Management in the Construction Industry of Malaysia, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53(6): 321–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.01.005

Courard, L.; Michel, F.; Delhez, P. 2010. Use of Concrete Road Recycled Aggregates for Roller Compacted Concrete, Construction and Building Materials 24(3): 390–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.040

Čygas, D.; Mučinis, D.; Sivilevičius, H.; Abukauskas, N. 2011. Dependence of the Recycled Asphalt Mixture Physical and Mechanical Properties on the Grade and Amount of Rejuvenating Bitumen, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 6(2): 124–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.17

De Guzmán Báez, A.; Villoria Sáez, P.; del Río Merino, M.; García Navarro, J. 2012. Methodology for Quantification of Waste Generated in Spanish Railway Construction Works, Waste Management 32(5): 920–924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.007

Helsen, L.; Van den Bulck, E. 2005. Review оf Disposal Technologies for Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA) Treated Wood Waste, with Detailed Analyses of Thermochemical Conversion Processes, Environmental Pollution 134(2): 301–314.

Indraratna, B.; Salim, W. 2003. Deformation and Degradation Mechanics of Recycled Ballast Stabilised with Geosynthetics, Soils and Foundation 43(4): 35–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3208/sandf.43.4_35

Kuo, M. F.; Du, J. C.; Shen, D. H. 2010. Crushed Waste Concrete in Stone Mastic Asphalt Mixtures, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 5(3): 164–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2010.23

Llatas, C. 2011. A Model for Quantifying Construction Waste in Projects According to the European Waste List, Waste Management 31(6): 1261–1276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.023

Lu, W.; Yuan, H. 2011. A Framework for Understanding Waste Management Studies in Construction, Waste Management 31(6): 1252–1260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018

Osmani, M.; Glass, J.; Price, A. D. F. 2008. Architects’ Perspectives on Construction Waste Reduction by Design, Waste Management 28(7): 1147–1158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.011

Pons, O.; Aguado, A. 2012. Integrated Value Model for Sustainable Assessment Applied to Technologies Used to Build Schools in Catalonia, Spain, Building and Environment 53: 49–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.007

Poon, C. S.; Chan, D. 2006. Feasible Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Crushed Clay Brick as Unbound Road Sub-Base, Construction and Building Materials 20(8): 578–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.045

Sanchez-Alonso, E.; Castro-Fresno, D.; Vega-Zamanillo, A.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, J. 2011. Sustainable Asphalt Mixes: Use of Additives and Recycled Materials, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 6(4): 249–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.32

Solís-Guzmán, J.; Marrero, M.; Montes-Delgado, M. V.; Ramírezde-Arellano, A. 2009. A Spanish Model for Quantification and Management of Construction Waste, Waste Management 29(9): 2542–2548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.009

Tam, V. W. Y. 2008. On the Effectiveness in Implementing a Waste-Management-Plan Method in Construction, Waste Management 28(6): 1072–1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.007

Tojo, N.; Fischer, C. 2011. Europe as a Recycling Society: European Recycling Policies in Relation to the Actual Recycling Achieved. ETC/SCP working paper 2/2011. European Environment Agency. European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production. Copenhague, Denmark. 25 p.

Villoria Sáez, P.; Del Rio, M.; Porras-Amores, C. 2012. Estimation of Construction and Demolition Waste Volume Generation in New Residential Buildings in Spain, Waste Management & Research 30(2): 137–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X11423955

Wang, J.; Yuan, H.; Kang, X.; Lu, W. 2010. Critical Success Factors for On-Site Sorting of Construction Waste: a China Study, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54(11): 931–936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.01.012

Yuan, H.; Shen, L.; Hao, J. J. L.; Lu, W. 2011. A Model for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Construction and Demolition Waste Management throughout the Waste Chain, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55(6): 604–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.004

Yuan, H.; Shen, L. 2011. Trend of the Research on Construction and Demolition Waste Management, Waste Management 31(4): 670–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.030

Redefining Construction and Demolition Waste Management Systems: Best Practices on Civil Engineering Works

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

How to Cite