Concrete Bridge Deterioration Caused by De-Icing Salts in High Traffic Volume Road Environment in Latvia

Authors

  • Kristaps Gode Institute of Transport Infrastructure Engineering, Riga Technical University, Kaļķu str 1, LV 1658 Riga, Latvia
  • Ainars Paeglitis Institute of Transport Infrastructure Engineering, Riga Technical University, Kaļķu str 1, LV 1658 Riga, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.25

Keywords:

concrete bridges, service life, de-icing salts, chloride profiles, corrosion damage, road environment

Abstract

Design for durability of road infrastructures is becoming increasingly important in view of its large impact on economics. Reinforcement corrosion is the most common cause of concrete deterioration of bridge structures in Latvia. The ingress of chlorides is often considered to be the major threat to durability of concrete structures. During the winter season de-icing salts are spread out on roads to avoid formation of ice and ensure the anti-sliding properties of the road surface. The melting water mixes with de-icing salt are splashed and sprayed on reinforced concrete pier structures by passing vehicles. Absorbed water with chloride ions initiates and accelerates the reinforcement corrosion process. This paper highlights the results of investing accumulation of chlorides in reinforced concrete bridge piers located near high traffic volume roads in Latvia. The chloride contents were determined on different surfaces of reinforced concrete piers. Environmental conditions were analysed and prediction of remaining service life for chloride induced reinforcement corrosion was performed.

References

Bastidas-Arteaga, E.; Schoefs, F.; Stewart, M. G.; Wang, X. 2013. Influence of Global Warming on Durability of Corroding RC Structures: a Probabilistic Approach, Engineering Structures 51: 259–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.006

Beck, M.; Burkert, A.; Harnisch, J.; Isecke, B.; Osterminski, K.; Raupach, M.; Schießl, P.; Tian, W.; Warkus, J. 2012. Deterioration Model and Input Parameters for Reinforcement Corrosion, Structural Concrete 13(3): 145–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/suco.201200004

Demis, S.; Efstathiou, M. P.; Papadakis, V. G. 2014. Computer-Aided Modeling of Concrete Service Life, Cement and Concrete Composites 47: 9–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.004

Fischer, O.; Müller, A.; Lechner, T.; Wild, M.; Kessner, K. 2014. Findings and Insights Concerning the Results of Re-Analyzed Concrete Bridges in Germany, Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 109(2): 107–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201300084

Gao, R.; Li, Q.; Zhao, S. 2013. Concrete Deterioration Mechanisms under Combined Sulfate Attack and Flexural Loading, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 25(1): 39–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000538

Gode, K.; Paeglitis, A. 2012. Influence of De-Icing Salt on Concrete Pier Damages, in the 1st International Congress on Durability of Concrete. June 18–21, 2012 Trondheim, Norway: NTNU, 1–8.

Gode, K.; Paeglitis, A. 2007. Analysis of Influence of the Concrete Carbonation on Reinforced Concrete Bridge Service Life in Latvia, Construction Science 8: 25–35.

Gode, K.; Paeglitis, A. 2010. Service Life of Two 100 Year Old Concrete Bridges in Latvia, Construction Science 11: 13‒20.

Gołaski, L.; Goszczyńska, B.; Świt, G.; Trąmpczyński, W. 2012. System for the Global Monitoring and Evaluation of Damage Processes Developing Within Concrete Structures under Service Loads, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 7(4): 237–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2012.32

Kamaitis, Z. 2009. Modelling of Corrosion Protection as Standby System for Coated Reinforced Concrete Structures, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 15(4): 387–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.387-394

Lindvall, A. 2007. Chloride Ingress Data From Field and Laboratory Exposure – Influence of Salinity and Temperature, Cement and Concrete Composites 29(2): 88–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.08.004

Malerba, P. G. 2014. Inspecting and Repairing Old Bridges: Experiences and Lessons, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 10(4): 443–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.769010

Munch-Petersen, C.; Fagerlund, G.; Skotting, E.; Berrig, A. 1997. Concrete Strategy for the Oresund Tunnel, Betonwerk und Fertigteil-Technik/Concrete Precasting Plant and Technology 63(11): 44–45, 48.

Nilsson, L.-O. 2000. Numerical Simulation of Multi-Species Transport through Saturated Concrete During a Migration Test – MsDiff Code, Cement and Concrete Research 30(10): 1581–1592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00305-7

Rostam, S. 2003. Reinforced Concrete Structures ‒ Shall Concrete Remain the Dominating Means of Corrosion Prevention?, Materials and Corrosion 54(6): 369–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/maco.200390086

Strauss, A.; Wendner, R.; Bergmeister, K.; Costa, C. 2013. Numerically and Experimentally Based Reliability Assessment of a Concrete Bridge Subjected to Chloride-Induced Deterioration, Journal of Infrastructure Systems 19(2): 166–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000125

Tan, Y.-Q.; Li, L.-K.; Cao, P.; Mi, F.-Y.; Gong, X. -B. 2013. Analysis of Corrosion Mechanism and Deterioration Process for Dowel under De-Icing Salt Environment, Gongcheng Lixue/ Engineering Mechanics 30(12): 199–205.

Tang, L.; Lindvall, A. 2013. Validation of Models for Prediction of Chloride Ingress in Concrete Exposed in De-Icing Salt Road Environment, International Journal of Structural Engineering 4(1–2): 86–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2013.050766

Wang, L.; Wang, J. 2014. Mesoscale Simulation of Chloride Diffusion in Concrete Subjected to Flexural Loading, Advances in Structural Engineering 17(4): 561–572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.4.561

Downloads

Published

27.09.2014

How to Cite

Gode, K., & Paeglitis, A. (2014). Concrete Bridge Deterioration Caused by De-Icing Salts in High Traffic Volume Road Environment in Latvia. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 9(3), 200-207. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.25