Road Landscape as a Product: Does it Satisfy Consumers’ Aesthetic Needs?

Authors

  • Irina Matijošaitienė Dept of Architecture and Urbanism, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentų g. 48, 51367 Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Inga Stankevičė Dept of Management, Kaunas University of Technology, Donelaičio g. 20, 44239 Kaunas, Lithuania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.36

Keywords:

landscape management, road landscape, aesthetic, product, consumer, Kansei engineering, multiple linear regression, correlation analysis, descriptive statistics

Abstract

The contemporary market laws and consumer society impose that road users are regarded to as consumers, and road landscape – as a product. In this context, consumers’ willingness to use the product is equivalent to road users’ willingness to drive on the road. Consumers’ fastidiousness induces to develop road landscape in a way which ensures satisfaction of drivers’ versatile needs, including the aesthetic ones. However, development of desirable-to-drive road landscape remains one of the challenges of land management. Hence, based on the analysis of aesthetic needs of road users, the paper proposes a framework for creation of desirable-to-drive road landscape. The research rests on photofixation, Kansei engineering, regression, correlation and descriptive analyses. The landscape of the main Lithuanian roads was investigated. The results show that the willingness to drive on a road depends on the level of tune of all the elements comprising the roadscape, the amount of positive impression left by the roadscape, roadscape’s pleasurability, level of sophistication, and skittishness. The guidelines for the development of desirable to drive road landscape are proposed, and the map of distribution of roadscape in Lithuania, according to the willingness to drive, is drawn.

References

Augeri, M. G.; Colombrita, R.; Greco, S.; Sapienza, P. 2014. Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach to Network Bridge Management, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 9(1): 31‒42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.05

Bastian, O.; Grunewald, K.; Syrbe, R.-U.; Walz, U.; Wende, W. 2014. Landscape Services: the Concept and Its Practical Relevance, Landscape Ecology 29(9): 1463‒1479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0064-5

Chang, H. H.; Wang, H.-W. 2011. The Moderating Effect of Customer Perceived Value on Online Shopping Behaviour, Online Information Review 35(3): 333‒359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521111151414

Cullen, G. 1995. The Concise Townscape. 3rd edition. Oxford: Routledge, Architectural Press. 200 p. ISBN 978-0-7506-2018-5.

Dallos, M. 2013. Seeing Landscape: Geography, Autobiography, and Metaphor, Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes: an International Quarterly 34(2): 146‒150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14601176.2013.830424

Daub, C. H.; Ergenzinger, R. 2005. Enabling Sustainable Management through a New Multi-Disciplinary Concept of Consumer Satisfaction, European Journal of Marketing 39(9/10): 998‒1012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560510610680

Drottenborg, H. 2002. Are Beautiful Traffic Environments Safer than Ugly Traffic Environments. PhD Thesis 2002. Lund: LTH ‒ Technology and Society. 109 p.

Flint, D. J.; Larsson, E.; Gammelgaard, B. 2008. Exploring Processes for Customer Value Insights, Supply Chain Learning and Innovation: an International Study, Journal of Business Logistics 29(1): 257‒281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00078.x

Flint, D. J.; Woodruff, R. B.; Fisher, G. S. 2002. Exploring the Phenomenon of Consumers’ Desired Value Change in a Business-to-Business Context, Journal of Marketing 66(4): 102‒117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.4.102.18517

Grönroos, Ch.; Helle, P. 2010. Adopting a Service Logic in Manufacturing: Conceptual Foundation and Metrics for Mutual Value Creation, Journal of Service Management 21(5): 564–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09564231011079057

Hartono, M.; Chuan, T. K. 2011. How The Kano Model Contributes to Kansei Engineering in Services, Ergonomics 54(11): 987‒1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.616229

Holbrook, M. B. 2005. Consumer Value and Autoethnography: Subjective Personal Introspection and the Meanings of a Photograph Collection, Journal of Business Research 58(1): 45‒61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00079-1

Kasemets, K. 2014. Visual Meaning-Making in an Underprivileged Neighbourhood Landscape: Milieus and Atmospheres, Visual Communication 13(4): 459‒470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470357214542208

Khalifa, A. S. 2004. Customer Value: a Review of Recent Literature and an Integrative Configuration, Management Decision 42(5): 645‒666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740410538497

Liu, J.; Opdam, P. 2014. Valuing Ecosystem Services in Community-Based Landscape Planning: Introducing a Wellbeing-Based Approach, Landscape Ecology 29(8): 1347‒1360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0045-8

Llinares, C.; Page, A. F. 2008. Differential Semantics as a Kansei Engineering Tool for Analysing the Emotional Impressions which Determine the Choice of Neighbourhood: the Case of Valencia, Spain, Landscape and Urban Planning 87(4): 247‒257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.006

Lynch, K. 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 514 p. ISBN 9780262120852.

Martelo Landroguez, S.; Barroso Castro, C.; Cepeda-Carrión, G. 2011. Creating Dynamic Capabilities to Increase Customer Value, Management Decision 49(7): 1141–1159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741111151181

Mascarenhas, O. A.; Kesavan, R.; Bernacchi, M. 2004. Customer Value-Chain Involvement for Co-Crating Customer Delight, Journal of Consumer Marketing 21(7): 486‒496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760410568707

Mele, C. 2007. The Synergic Relationship between TQM and Marketing in Creating Customer Value, Managing Service

Quality 17(3): 240‒258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09604520710744281

O’Sullivan, D.; McCallig, J. 2012. Customer Satisfaction, Earnings and Firm Value, European Journal of Marketing 46(6): 827‒843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090561211214627

Rintamäki, T.; Kuusela, H.; Mitronen, L. 2007. Identifying Competitive Customer Value Propositions in Retailing, Managing Service Quality 17(6): 621‒634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09604520710834975

Ryu, K.; Han, H.; Jang, S. 2010. Relationships among Hedonic and Utilitarian Values, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions in the Fast-Casual Restaurant Industry, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 22(3): 416‒432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09596111011035981

Santala, M.; Parvinen, P. 2007. From Strategic Fit to Customer Fit, Management Decision 45(3): 582–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740710745133

Stankevičė, I. 2009. Consumer Capital as a Contributor to Prioritizing Dimensions of Consumer Perceived Value. Master thesis 2009. Kaunas: Kaunas University of Technology. 69 p.

Strandvik, T.; Holmlund, M.; Edvardsson, B. 2012. Customer Needing: a Challenge for the Seller Offering, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 27(2): 132–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858621211196994

Downloads

Published

27.12.2014

How to Cite

Matijošaitienė, I., & Stankevičė, I. (2014). Road Landscape as a Product: Does it Satisfy Consumers’ Aesthetic Needs?. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 9(4), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.36