Geodetic Monitoring of Bridge Deformations Occurring During Static Load Testing

Authors

  • Tarvo Mill Dept of Road Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
  • Artu Ellmann Dept of Road Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
  • Martti Kiisa Faculty of Construction, Tallinn University of Applied Sciences, Pärnu mnt 62, 10135 Tallinn, Estonia
  • Juhan Idnurm Dept of Road Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
  • Siim Idnurm Dept of Road Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
  • Milan Horemuz Dept of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Royal Institute of Technology, Drottning Kristinas väg 30, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Andrus Aavik Dept of Road Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.03

Keywords:

Terrestrial Laser Scanning, precise levelling, load testing, monitoring deformations, cantilever beam

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanning technology has developed rapidly in recent years and has been used in various applications but mainly in the surveying of different buildings and historical monuments. The use for terrestrial laser scanning data for deformation monitoring has earlier been tested although conventional surveying technologies are still more preferred. Since terrestrial laser scanners are capable of acquiring a large amount of highly detailed geometrical data from a surface it is of interest to study the metrological advantages of the terrestrial laser scanning technology for deformation monitoring of structures. The main intention of this study is to test the applicability of terrestrial laser scanning technology for determining range and spatial distribution of deformations during bridge load tests. The study presents results of deformation monitoring proceeded during a unique bridge load test. A special monitoring method-ology was developed and applied at a static load test of a reinforced concrete cantilever bridge built in 1953. Static loads with the max force of up to 1961 kN (200 t) were applied onto an area of 12 m² in the central part of one of the main beams; the collapse of the bridge was expected due to such an extreme load. Although the study identified occurrence of many cracks in the main beams and significant vertical deformations, both deflection (–4.2 cm) and rising (+2.5 cm), the bridge did not collapse. The terrestrial laser scanning monitoring results were verified by high-precision levelling. The study results confirmed that the TLS accuracy can reach ±2.8 mm at 95% confidence level.

References

Abbas, M. A.; Setan, H.; Majid; Z.; Lichti, D. D.; Chong, K. A. 2013. A Self-Calibration of the Leica Scanstation C10 Scanner, in Proc. of the IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC). 7–9 April 2013, Langkawi, Malaysia, 262‒266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560128

Alba, M.; Scaioni, M. 2007. Comparison of Techniques for Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data Georeferencing Applied to 3-D Modeling of Cultural Heritage, in Proc. of the 3D-ARCH 2007 “Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures”, XXXVI-5/W47. 12–13 July 2007, Zurich, Switzerland.

Antanavičiūtė, U.; Obuchovski, R.; Paršeliūnas, E. K.; Popovas, M. G. D.; Šlikas, D. 2013. Some Issues Regarding the Calibration of the Terrestrial Laser Scanner Leica Scanstation C10, Geodesy and Cartography 39(3): 138–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20296991.2013.840356

Becerik-Gerber, B.; Jazizadeh, F.; Kavulya, G.; Calis, G. 2011. Assessment of Target Types and Layouts in 3D Laserscanning for Registration Accuracy, Automation in Construction 20(5): 649–658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.12.008

Bungey, J. H.; Millard, S. G. 1996. Testing of Concrete in Structures. Glasgow, United Kingdom: Chapman & Hall. 286 p. ISBN 0-203-48783-4.

Gruen, A.; Akca, D. 2005. Least Squares 3D Surface and Curve Matching, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 59(3): 151–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.02.006

Lichti, D. D. 2007. Error Modelling, Calibration and Analysis of an AM–CW Terrestrial Laser Scanner System, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 61(5): 307–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.10.004

Lichti, D. D. 2010. Terrestrial Laser Scanner Self-Calibration: Correlation Sources and Their Mitigation, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65(1): 93–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.09.002

Mill, T.; Ellmann, A.; Aavik, A.; Horemuz, M.; Sillamäe, S. 2014. Determining Ranges and Spatial Distribution of Road Frost Heave by Terrestrial Laser Scanning, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 9(3): 227–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.28

Mill, T.; Ellmann, A.; Uueküla, K.; Joala, V. 2011. Road Surface Surveying Using Terrestrial Laser Scanner and Total Station Technologies, in Proc. of 8th International Conference Environmental Engineering. Ed. by Čygas, D.; Froehner, K. D., 19–20 May 2011, Vilnius, Lithuania. Vilnius: Technika, 1142–1147.

Monserrat, O.; Crosetto, M. 2008. Deformation Measurement Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data and Least Squares 3D Surface Matching, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 63(1): 142–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.07.008

Quintero, M. S.; Genechten, B. V.; de Bruyne, M.; Poelman, R.; Hankar, M.; Barnes, S.; Caner, H.; Budei, L., Heine, E.; Reiner, H.; García, J. L. L.; Taronger, J. M. B. 2008. Theory and practice on Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Training material based on practical applications. 241 p.

Reshetyuk, Y. 2009. Self-Calibration and Direct Georeferencing in Terrestrial. PhD thesis 978-91-85539-34-5. Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska högskolan [Royal Institute of Technology]. Universitetsservice US AB.

Reshetyuk, Y. 2010. A Unified Approach to Self-Calibration of Terrestrial Laser Scanners, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65(5): 445‒456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.05.005

Riveiroa, B.; González-Jorgeb, H.; Varelab, M.; Jaureguic, D. 2013. Validation of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry Techniques for the Measurement of Vertical Underclearance and Beam Geometry in Structural Inspection of Bridges, Measurement 46(1): 784–794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.09.018

Ryall, M. J. 2001. Bridge Management. Butterworth-Heinemann. 464 p. ISBN 978-0750650779.

Schulz, T. 2007. Calibration of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner for Engineering Geodesy. PhD thesis 17036. Berlin: Technical University of Berlin.

Soudarissanane, S.; Lindenbergh, R.; Menenti, M.; Teunissen, P. 2011. Scanning Geometry: Influencing Factor on the Quality of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Points, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 66(4): 389–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.01.005

Soudarissanane, S.; van Ree, J.; Bucksch, A.; Lindenbergh, R. 2007. Error Budget of Terrestrial Laser Scanning: Infuence of the Incidence Angle on the Scan Quality, in Proc. of the 3D-NordOst 2007. 6–7 September 2007. Berlin, Germany.

Staiger, R. 2003. Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Technology, Systems and Applications, in Proc. of the 2nd FIG Regional Conference. 2–5 December 2003, Marrakech, Morocco.

Tsakiri, M. L.; Pfeifer, N. 2006. Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Deformation Monitoring, in Proc. of the 12th FIG symposium on Deformation Measurement and 3rd IAG Symposium on Geodesy for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering. 22–24 May 2006, Baden, Austria.

Vosselman, G.; Maas, H.-G. 2009. Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Dunbeath: Whittles Publisher. 320 p. ISBN 978- 1439827987.

Zogg, H.-M.; Ingensand, H. 2008. Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Deformation Monitoring – Load Tests on the Felsenau Viaduct (CH), in Proc. of the XXIst ISPRS Congress. 3–11 July 2008, Beijing, China.

Downloads

Published

27.03.2015

How to Cite

Mill, T., Ellmann, A., Kiisa, M., Idnurm, J., Idnurm, S., Horemuz, M., & Aavik, A. (2015). Geodetic Monitoring of Bridge Deformations Occurring During Static Load Testing. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 10(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.03