Minimum Revenue Guarantee and Toll Revenue Cap Optimization for Ppp Highways: Pareto Optimal State Approach

Yuanqing Wang, Zihua Li, Yanan Gao

Abstract


In the Public-Private Partnership highway projects the Minimum Revenue Guarantee and Toll Revenue Cap policies are effective measures for risk and benefit sharing between the government and the private sector. However, if the Minimum Revenue Guarantee and Toll Revenue Cap values are unreasonable, it may lead one part of the investors to take too much risk and financial burden. This paper mainly establishes six objectives from the return and risk perspectives of the government, the concessionaire and the overall situation respectively. Because the traditional Discount Cash Flow method does not consider the risk factors, this paper proposes to use Monte Carlo simulation and scatter search algorithm to calculate the optimal values of the Minimum Revenue Guarantee and Toll Revenue Cap under different objectives. Compared with the statistics of the Net Present Value under different cases, it was summarized that when the objective is minimizing the variance of the total Net Present Value, the investors will realize the Pareto optimal state between the return and risk. In addition, it was found that the government is more sensitive to the Minimum Revenue Guarantee and Toll Revenue Cap marginal values according to the sensitive analysis. Therefore, the model has an effect on improving the fairness of the risk sharing measures, reducing the financial burden of the investors especially the government, and increasing the investment attraction of the private sectors.

Keywords:

Minimum Revenue Guarantee; Monte Carlo; Net Present Value; risk; scatter search algorithm; Toll Revenue Cap

Full Text:

PDF

References


Almassi, A.; McCabe, B., Thomson, M. 2012. A Real Options Based Approach for Valuation of Government Guarantees in Public-Private-Partnerships, Journal of Infrastructure Systems 19(2): 196–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000017

Ashuri, B.; Kashani, H.; Molenaar, K. R.; Lee, S.; Lu, J. 2012. A Risk-Neutral Pricing Approach for Evaluating BOT Highway Projects with Government Minimum Revenue Guarantee Options, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 138(4): 545–557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000447

Ashuri, B.; Lu, J.; Kashani, H. 2011. A Real Options Framework to Evaluate Investments in Toll Road Projects Delivered under the Two-Phase Development Strategy, Built Environment Project and Asset Management 1(1): 14–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20441241111143759

Baek, I. M.; Bandopadhyaya, A.; Du, C. 2005. Determinants of Market-Assessed Sovereign Risk: Economic Fundamentals or Market Risk Appetite?, Journal of International Money and Finance 24(4): 533–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2005.03.007

Chiang, W. C.; Russell, R. A. 2006. Scatter Search for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows, European Journal of Operational Research 169(2): 606–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.018

Garci-Lopez, F.; Melian-Batista, B.; Moreno-Perez, J. A.; More- no-Vega, J. M. 2003. Parallelization of the Scatter Search for the P-Median Problem, Journal of Parallel Computing 29(5): 575–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8191(03)00043-7

Garvin, M. J. 2005. Real Options Analysis: Can It Improve Infrastructure Development Decisions?, Journal of Construction Research Congress: 501–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40754(183)98

Glover, F. 1977. Heuristics for Integer Programming Using Surrogate Constraints, Journal of Decision Sciences 8(1): 156– 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1977.tb01074.x

Kim, D. Y.; Han, S. H.; Ashuri, B. 2010. A Financial Market Entry Decision Model for International Construction Business Using Real Option Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulation, Journal of Construction Research Congress: 1307–1315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41109(373)131

Laguna, M.; Martí, R. 2005. Experimental Testing of Advanced Scatter Search Designs for Global Optimization of Multimodal Functions, Journal of Global Optimization 33(2): 235–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10898-004-1936-z

Laguna, M.; Martí, R.; Martí, R. C. 2003. Scatter Search: Methodology and Implementations in C. New York. 291 p. ISBN 1461350271.

Mandri-Perrott, C. 2006. Mobilizing Private Capital and into Infrastructure Development, The World Bank Infrastructure Economics and Finance Department (IEF) Workshop, 9 May, 2006, Riga, Latvia.

Marti, R.; Laguna, M.; Glover, F. 2006. Principles of Scatter Search, European Journal of Operational Research 169(2): 359–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.004

Nebro, A. J.; Luna, F.; Alba, E.; Dorronsoro, B.; Durillo, J. J.; Beham,

A. 2008. AbYSS: Adapting Scatter Search for Multiobjective Optimization, Journal of Evolutionary Computation 12(4): 439–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2007.913109

Park, T.; Kim, B.; Kim, H. 2012. Real Option Approach to Sharing Privatization Risk in Underground Infrastructures, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 139(6): 685–693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000636

Walton, M. 2010. FPGA Implementation of Scatter Search Using Handel-C: Master Thesis. University of Guelph. 175 p.

Zhao, T.; Sundararajan, S. K. 2004. Highway Development Decision-Making under Uncertainty: a Real Options Approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 10(1): 23–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:1(23)




DOI: 10.3846/bjrbe.2015.46

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press Technika