Experimental Investigation of Cracking Behaviour of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Steel Fibres Produced in Lithuania

Authors

  • Adas Meškėnas Research Laboratory of Innovative Building Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, Vilnius, LT–10223, Lithuania
  • Viktor Gribniak Research Laboratory of Innovative Building Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, Vilnius, LT–10223, Lithuania
  • Gintaris Kaklauskas Research Laboratory of Innovative Building Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, Vilnius, LT–10223, Lithuania
  • Aleksandr Sokolov Research Laboratory of Innovative Building Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, Vilnius, LT–10223, Lithuania
  • Eugenijus Gudonis Research Laboratory of Innovative Building Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, Vilnius, LT–10223, Lithuania
  • Arvydas Rimkus Research Laboratory of Innovative Building Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, Vilnius, LT–10223, Lithuania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2017.10

Keywords:

bar reinforcement, cracking, reinforced concrete, residual strength, steel fibres, test data.

Abstract

Concrete is the most widely used material for bridge structures in Lithuania. A case study performed by the authors revealed that application of fibres might improve serviceability of such structures. However, adequacy of prediction of the post-cracking behaviour of steel fibre reinforced concrete might be insufficient. The latter issue is closely related to the assessment of the residual strength of steel fibre reinforced concrete. The residual strength, in most cases, is considered as a material property of the cracked concrete. However, in the prediction of the structural behaviour of the concrete members with bar reinforcement, a straightforward application of the residual strength values assessed by using standard techniques might lead to incorrect results. The present study deals with the post-cracking behaviour of structural elements made of concrete with aggregates and fibres provided by Lithuanian companies. Test results of three full-scale and sixteen standard steel fibre reinforced concrete beams with two different content of fibres (23.6 kg/m3 and 47.1 kg/m3) are presented. The full-scale beams were reinforced with high-grade steel bars. Effectiveness of the application of the mini- mum content of the fibres in combination with bar reinforcement was revealed experimentally.

References

Afroughsabet, V.; Biolzi, L.; Ozbakkaloglu, T. 2016. High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete: a Review, Journal of Materials Science 51(14): 6517–6551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9917-4

Blesak, L.; Goremikins, V.; Wald, F.; Sajdlova, T. 2016. Constitutive Model of Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Subjected to High Temperatures, Journal of Advanced Engineering 56(6): 417–424. https://doi.org/10.14311/ap.2016.56.0417

Deluce, J. R.; Lee, S. C.; Vecchio, F. J. 2014. Crack Model for Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Members Containing Conventional Reinforcement, ACI Structural Journal 111(1): 93–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.14359.51686433

Gopalaratnam, V. S. 1995. On the Characterization of Flexural Toughness in Fiber Reinforced Concretes, Cement and Concrete Composites 17(3): 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(95)99506-O

Gribniak, V.; Arnautov, A. K.; Norkus, A.; Kliukas, R.; Tamulenas, V.; Gudonis, E.; Sokolov, A. 2016. Steel Fibres: Effective Way to Prevent Failure of the Concrete Bonded with FRP Sheets, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2016: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4913536

Gribniak, V.; Kaklauskas, G.; Kwan, A. K. H.; Bacinskas, D.; Ulbinas, D. 2012. Deriving Stress-Strain Relationships for Steel Fibre Concrete in Tension from Tests of Beams with Ordinary Reinforcement, Engineering Structures 42: 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.032

Groli, G.; Caldentey, A. P. 2016. Improving Cracking Behaviour with Recycled Steel Fibres Targeting Specific Applications – Analysis According to Model Code 2010, Structural Concrete 18(1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500170

Iqbal, S.; Ali, A.; Holschemacher, K.; Bier, T. A. 2015. Mechanical Properties of Steel Fiber Reinforced High Strength Lightweight Self-Compacting Concrete (SHLSCC), Construction and Building Materials 98: 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.112

Kaklauskas, G.; Gribniak, V.; Bačinskas, D.; Rimkus, A.; Juozapaitis, A.; Misiūnaitė, I.; Tamulėnas, V.; Gudonis, E.; Merkevičius, T.; Garškaitė, A. 2014. Sumaniųjų tiltų vystymo Lietuvoje galimybių studija, įvertinant išsivysčiusių šalių patirtį (Feasibility Study: Development of Smart Bridges in Lithuania Taking into Account the Experience of Developed Countries), VGTU, 283 p. in Lithuanian

Rafiei, M. H.; Khushefati, W. H.; Demirboga, R.; Adeli, H. 2016. Neural Network, Machine Learning, and Evolutionary Approaches for Concrete Material Characterization, ACI Materials Journal 113(6): 781–789. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689360

Sahoo, D. R.; Sharma, A. 2014. Effect of Steel Fiber Content on Behavior of Concrete Beams with and without Stirrups, ACI Structural Journal 111(5): 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686821

Sanchez-Aparicio, L. J.; Ramos, L. F.; Sena-Cruz, J.; Barros, J. O.; Riveiro, B. 2015. Experimental and Numerical Approaches for Structural Assessment in New Footbridge Designs (SFRSCC– GFPR Hybrid Structure), Composite Structures 134: 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.041

Vandewalle, L. 2000. Cracking Behaviour of Concrete Beams Reinforced with a Combination of Ordinary Reinforcement and Steel Fibers, Materials and Structures 33(3): 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479410

Downloads

Published

25.06.2017

How to Cite

Meškėnas, A., Gribniak, V., Kaklauskas, G., Sokolov, A., Gudonis, E., & Rimkus, A. (2017). Experimental Investigation of Cracking Behaviour of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Steel Fibres Produced in Lithuania. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 12(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2017.10