Voluntary Risk Taking by Young Bicyclists: A Case Study of University Students at Montreal

Shohel Reza Amin

Abstract


Young bicyclists in Montreal are taking voluntary risks such as bicycling without wearing helmet and braking system of bicycle although they are aware of the presence of danger. This article analyses the behaviour of young bicyclists taking voluntary risks. The university students in Montreal are considered as the case study since they are more risk takers and the bicycle is a favorite mode of transport among them. This study reveals that half of the respondents did not use helmets. They were also spontaneously taking a risk by high speeding, violating signals, bicycling in mixed traffic, ignoring protective equipment after dark, and avoiding the bicycle designated roads. They were taking voluntary risks based on their attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control. They did not perceive the severity of risks since they experienced relevant and unremarkable minor injuries. The attractiveness of risk and accomplishing the risk activities encouraged the young bicyclists to take voluntary risks repeatedly. Increasing feelings of vulnerability among young bicyclists reduce voluntary risks taking attitude and physical and psychological sufferings of the victims of bicycle-related accidents. Findings of this study suggest that the City of Montreal as well as other cities consider the behaviour of bicyclists particularly the young people to avoid bicycle-related accidents along with other physical measures.

Keywords:
behaviour; helmet; information; law; perception; risk.

Full Text:

 PDF

References


Bamberg, S.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. 2003. Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: the Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 25(3): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_01

Costa, C. 2014. Comparative Costs and Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury from Biking Accidents with or without Helmet Use: Ms. Thesis. Montreal, Canada: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Dept, McGill University Health Centre-Montreal General Hospital. 127 p. Available from Internet: https://papyrus. bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1866/11806/Costa_ Camille_2014_memoire.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Forward, S. E. 2009. An Assessment of What Motivates Road Violations, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 12(3): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.12.003

Fyhri, A.; Bjørnskau, T.; Backer-Grøndahl, A. 2012. Bicycle Helmets – a Case of Risk Compensation?, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 15(5): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.06.003

Hagel, B. E.; Yanchar, N. L. 2013. Bicycle Helmet Use in Canada: the Need for Law to Reduce the Risk of Head Injury, Pediatrics & Child Health 18(9): 475–480.

Hendrie, D.; Legge, M.; Rosman, D.; Kirov, C. 1999. An Economic Evaluation of the Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Legislation in Western Australia. In 1999 Insurance Commission of Western Australia Conference on Road Safety. Insurance Commission of Western Australia, Perth, 1 January 1999. 29 p.

Hunter, W. W.; Pein, W. E.; Stutts, J. C. 1995. Bicycle–Motor Vehicle Crash Types: the Early 1990s, Transportation Research Record 1502: 65–74.

Jewett, A.; Beck, L. F.; Taylor, C.; Baldwin, G. 2016. Bicycle Helmet Use among Persons 5 Years and Older in the United States, 2012, Journal of Safety Research 59: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.09.001

Ji, M.; Gilchick, R. A.; Bender, S. J. 2006. Trends in Helmet Use and Head Injuries in San Diego County: the Effect of Bicycle Helmet Law, Accident Analysis & Prevention 38(1): 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.08.002

Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect Theory: an Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica 47(2): 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Karkhaneh, M.; Kalenga, J. C.; Hagel, B. E.; Rowe, B. H. 2006. Effectiveness of Bicycle Helmet Law to Increase Helmet Use: a Systematic Review, Injury Prevention 12(2): 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2005.010942

Karkhaneh, M.; Rowe, B. H.; Saunders, L. D.; Voaklander, D. C.; Hagel, B. E. 2011. Bicycle Helmet Use Four Years After the Introduction of Helmet Law in Alberta, Canada,. Accident Analysis & Prevention 43(3): 788–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.026

Kett, P.; Rivara, F.; Gomez, A.; Kirk, A. P.; Yantsides, C. 2016. The Effect of an All-Ages Bicycle Helmet Law on Bicycle-Related Trauma, Journal of Community Health 41(6): 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0197-3

Lajunen, T. 2016. Barriers and Facilitators of Bicycle Helmet Use among Children and Their Parents, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 41(B): 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.03.005

Lajunen, T.; Räsänen, M. 2004. Can Social Psychological Models be Used to Promote Bicycle Helmet Use among Teenagers? A Comparison of the Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior and the Locus of Control, Journal of Safety Research 35(1): 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.020

Ludwig, T. D.; Buchholz, C.; Clarke, S. W. 2005. Using Social Marketing to Increase the Use of Helmets among Bicyclists, Journal of American College Health 54(1): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.54.1.51-58

Lupton, D.; Tulloch, J. 2002. Life Would be Pretty Dull without Risk’: Voluntary Risk-Taking and Its Pleasures, Health, Risk & Society 4(2): 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570220137015

Macknin, M. L.; Mendendorp, S. V. 1994. Association between Bicycle Helmet Law, Bicycle Safety Education, and Use of Bicycle Helmets in Children, Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 148(3): 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170030025005

Macpherson, A. K.; Macarthur, C.; To, T. M.; Chipman, M. L.; Wright, J. G.; Parkin, P. C. 2006. Economic Disparity in Bicycle Helmet Use by Children Six Years after the Introduction of Law, Injury Prevention 12(4): 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2005.011379

Macpherson, A.; Spinks, A. 2008. Bicycle Helmet Law for the Uptake of Helmet Use and Prevention of Head Injuries, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008(3): CD005401. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005401.pub3

McIntosh, A. S.; Lai, A.; Schilter, E. 2013. Bicycle Helmets: Head Impact Dynamics in Helmeted and Unhelmeted Oblique Impact Tests, Traffic Injury Prevention 14(5): 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2012.727217

Mandic, S.; Flaherty, C.; Pocock, T.; Mintoft-Jones, A.; Frater, J.; Chillón, P.; Bengoechea, E. G. 2016. Attitudes Towards Cycle Skills Training in New Zealand Adolescents, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 42(1): 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.08.002

Robinson, D. L. 2006. Do Enforced Bicycle Helmet Laws Improve Public Health? No Clear Evidence from Countries that Have Enforced the Wearing of Helmets, British Medical Journal 332(7543): 722–725. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7543.722

Robinson, D. L. 2007. Bicycle Helmet Law: Can We Reach a Consensus? Accident Analysis & Prevention 39(1): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.007

Schieber, R. A.; Kresnow, M.; Sacks, J. J.; Pledger, E. E.; O’Neil, J. M.; Toomey, K. E. 1996. Effect of a State Law on Reported Bicycle Helmet Ownership and Use, Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 150(7): 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170320053009

Sieg, G. 2016. Costs and Benefits of a Bicycle Helmet Law for Germany, Transportation 43(5): 935–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9632-z

Strauss, J.; Miranda-Moreno, L. F.; Morency, P. 2013. Cyclist Activity and Injury Risk Analysis at Signalized Intersections: a Bayesian Modelling Approach, Accident Analysis & Prevention 59: 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.037

Taylor, M.; Scuffham, P. 2002. New Zealand Bicycle Helmet Law – Do the Costs Outweigh the Benefits? Injury Prevention 8(4): 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.8.4.317

Thompson, N. J.; Sleet, D.; Sacks, J. J. 2002. Increasing the Use of Bicycle Helmets: Lessons from Behavior Science, Patient Education and Counseling 46(3): 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00212-9

Turner, S.; Wood, G.; Hughes, T.; Singh, R. 2011. Safety Performance Functions for Bicycle Crashes in New Zealand and Australia, Transportation Research Record 2236: 66–73. https://doi.org/10.3141/2236-08

Walker, I. 2007. Drivers Overtaking Bicyclists: Objective Data on the Effects of Riding Position, Helmet Use, Vehicle Type and Apparent Gender, Accident Analysis & Prevention 39(2): 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.010

Wessels, R. L. 1996. Bicycle Collisions in Washington State: a Six-Year Perspective, 1988–1993, Transportation Research Record 1538: 81–90. https://doi.org/10.3141/1538-11

Yagil, D. 1998. Gender and Age-Related Differences in Attitudes Toward Traffic Laws and Traffic Violations, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 1(2): 123– 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(98)00010-2




DOI: 10.3846/bjrbe.2017.32

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press Technika