Analysis and Assessment of Lithuanian Road Accidents by AHP Method

Marius Jakimavičius


Lithuanian road accidents were evaluated based on the geographic information systems and multi-criteria method of Analytical Hierarchy Process This paper presents the methodology for selecting and ranking high accident concentration sections on the roads of national significance. Methodology involves the following process phases: 1) preparation of spatial data of the road accidents; 2) estimation of road sections with a high accident rate; 3) calculation of spatial statistics for estimation of accident points and hot spots; 4) selecting indicators for multi-criteria assessment; 5) calculation by Analytical Hierarchy Process method and ranking the selected high accident concentration sections. Assessment of spatial clustering of accidents and hot spots was carried out following geo-information technologies and using Getis-Ord Gi  statistics and point density functions. This geospatial criterion was integrated into multicriteria assessment for ranking the high accident concentration sections by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method. Presented method is useful for various agencies in order to improve their planning and management strategies for better traffic conditions as well as to reduce the number of accidents. The result of the research presents selection methodology of dangerous accident section and ranking of the tenth the most dangerous sections involving geographic information systems and Analytical Hierarchy Process method.


accident coefficient; Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); Getis-Ord Gi *; GIS; multi-criteria analysis; road accident

Full Text:



Aghdaie, M. H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Prioritizing constructing projects of municipalities based on AHP and COPRAS-G: a case study about footbridges in Iran. The Baltic journal of road and bridge engineering, 7(2), 145-153. 10.3846/bjrbe.2012.20

Ait-Mlouk, A., Gharnati, F., & Agouti, T. (2017). An improved approach for association rule mining using a multi-criteria decision support system: a case study in road safety. European transport research review, 9(3), 40.

Al-Harbi, K. M. A. S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International journal of project management, 19(1), 19-27.

Chen, S. L., Pham, V. K., & Chen, J. K. (2016). Evaluating and selecting the best outsourcing service country in East and Southeast Asia: an AHP approach. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44(1), 89-101.

Cheng, W., & Washington, S. (2008). New criteria for evaluating methods of identifying hot spots. Transportation Research Record, 2083(1), 76-85.

Dell’Acqua, G., De Luca, M., & Mauro, R. (2011). Road safety knowledge-based decision support system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 973-983.

Dereli, M. A., & Erdogan, S. (2017). A new model for determining the traffic accident black spots using GIS-aided spatial statistical methods. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 106-117.

Ebdon, D. (1991). Statistics in Geography: A Practical Approach-Revised with 17 Programs. Wiley-Blackwell.

Erdogan, S., Yilmaz, I., Baybura, T., & Gullu, M. (2008). Geographical information systems aided traffic accident analysis system case study: city of Afyonkarahisar. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(1), 174-181.

Esri (2017). ArcGIS Pro users guide. Available from the Internet: http://pro. getis-ord-gi-spatial-stati.htm

Fancello, G., Carta, M., & Fadda, P. (2015). A decision support system for road safety analysis. Transportation Research Procedia, 5, 201-210.

Hajeeh, M. A. (2012). Traffic Accidents in Kuwait: A Decision Making Analysis. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, 6(2), 84-92.

International Transport Forum (ITF) (2017). Road Safety Annual Report 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris. 584 p.

Jasiūnienė, V., & Čygas, D. (2013). Road Accident Prediction Model for the Roads of National Significance of Lithuania. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 8(1): 66-73.

Jasiūnienė, V., Čygas, D., Ratkevičiūtė, K., & Peltola, H. (2012). Safety Ranking of the Lithuanian Road Network of National Significance. Baltic Journal of Road & Bridge Engineering, 7(2).

Kumar, S., & Toshniwal, D. (2017). Severity analysis of powered two wheeler traffic accidents in Uttarakhand, India. European transport research review, 9(2), 24.

Lagarde, E. (2011). Road Traffic Injuries. Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, 892–900.

Li, L., Zhu, L., & Sui, D. Z. (2007). A GIS-based Bayesian approach for analyzing spatial–temporal patterns of intra-city motor vehicle crashes. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(4), 274-285.

Lithuanian Road Administration under the Ministry of Transport and Communications (2017). Statistics of Fatal and Injury Road Accidents in Lithuania, 2013–2016. 112 p.

Mohaymany, A. S., Shahri, M., & Mirbagheri, B. (2013). GIS-based method for detecting high-crash-risk road segments using network kernel density estimation. Geo-spatial Information Science, 16(2), 113-119.

Mostafa, M. A., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2014). Stakeholder-sensitive social welfare– oriented benefit analysis for sustainable infrastructure project development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9), 04014038.

Podvezko, V., & Sivilevičius, H. (2013). The use of AHP and rank correlation methods for determining the significance of the interaction between the elements of a transport system having a strong influence on traffic safety. Transport, 28(4), 389-403.

Road and Transport Research Institute (2011). Methodology for Identifying High-Accident Locations on the Roads of National Significance. 2011 approved by the Decree No. 3-342 of the Minister of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania (in Lithuanian)

Road and Transport Research Institute (2016). Available from Internet: http:// (in Lithuanian)

Saaty, T. L. (1990a). Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. RWS publications. Saaty, T. L. (1990b). How to make a decition: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26.

Saaty, T. L. (1995). Transport planning with multiple criteria: the analytic hierarchy process applications and progress review. Journal of advanced transportation, 29(1), 81-126.

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 175). Springer Science & Business Media.

Satria, R., & Castro, M. (2016). GIS tools for analyzing accidents and road design: a review. Transportation research procedia, 18, 242-247.

Schuurman, N., Cinnamon, J., Crooks, V. A., & Hameed, S. M. (2009). Pedestrian injury and the built environment: an environmental scan of hotspots. BMC public health, 9(1), 233.

Shafabakhsh, G. A., Famili, A., & Bahadori, M. S. (2017). GIS-based spatial analysis of urban traffic accidents: Case study in Mashhad, Iran. Journal of traffic and transportation engineering (English edition), 4(3), 290-299.

Sivilevičius, H., & Maskeliūnaitė, L. (2010). The criteria for identifying the quality of passengers’ transportation by railway and their ranking using AHP method. Transport, 25(4), 368-381.

Stanujkic, D. (2016). An extension of the ratio system approach of MOORA method for group decision-making based on interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(1), 122-141.

World Health Organization (WHO) (2013). Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. Geneva: World Health Organization.

DOI: 10.7250/bjrbe.2018-13.414


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Marius Jakimavičius

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.