Modal testing of an isolated overpass bridge in its construction stages

Authors

  • Fuat Aras Istanbul Medeniyet University, Ünalan Kampüsü, H Blok, No:25, Üsküdar 34700, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2018.398

Keywords:

construction stages, dynamic identification, modal testing, pedestrian overpass

Abstract

This study presents the application of ambient vibration survey based dynamic testing on an isolated, precast and pre-stressed overpass bridge during and after its construction. In the studied three-bay bridge, the girders are located on the elastomeric bearings carried by two abutments and two internal piers. The first modal testing is performed after the placement of the girders on the elastomeric bearings and dynamic properties of the uncompleted bridge are determined. After the completion of all construction works and the opening of the overpass to human traffic, the modal testing is repeated to obtain the dynamic properties of the final structure. The dynamic properties obtained in both analyses are used to interpret the effects of the performed works between two modal testing. Moreover, the structural behaviour of isolated, precast and pre-stressed bridges is evaluated in detail.

References

Altunışık, A. C., Bayraktar, A., Sevim, B., & Ateş, Ş. (2011). Ambient vibration based seismic evaluation of isolated Gülburnu highway bridge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(11), 1496-1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.020

Aras, F., & Altay, G. (2015). Seismic evaluation and structural control of historical Beylerbeyi Palace. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 22(2), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1677

Bedon, C., & Morassi, A. (2014). Dynamic testing and parameter identification of a base-isolated bridge. Engineering Structures, 60, 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.017

Benedettini, F., & Gentile, C. (2011). Operational modal testing and FE model tuning of a cable-stayed bridge. Engineering Structures, 33, 2063-2073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.046

Chan, T. H. T., Law, S. S., & Yung, T. H. (1998). Modal test on an existing concrete bridge: experience acquired. HKIE Transactions, 5(3), 8-16.

Chisari, C., Bedon, C., & Amadio, C. (2015). Dynamic and static identification of base-isolated bridges using Genetic Algorithms. Engineering Structures, 102, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.043

Inman, D. J. (2013). Engineering vibration (720 p.) (4th ed.). Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Ko, J. M., & Ni, Y. Q. (2005). Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Engineering Structures, 27, 1715-1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021

Lin, X., Zhang, L., & Guo, Q. (2009). Dynamic finite element model updating of prestressed concrete continuous box-girder bridge. Earthquake Engimeering and Engineering Vibrations, 8(3), 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-8127-3

Matlab. (2012). The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.

Min, Z. H., & Sun, L. M. (2013). Wavelet-based structural modal parameter identification. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 20, 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.474

Michel, C., Gueguen, P., & Bard, P-Y. (2008). Dynamic parameters of structures extracted from ambient vibration measurements: An aid for the seismic vulnerability assessment of existing buildings in moderate seismic hazard regions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28, 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.002

Oruç, B., Sarıkaya, A., & Küçük, Y. E. (2016). Medeniyet University pedestrian overpass detailed design calculation report, Prepared for the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications.

Osmancikli, G., Bayraktar, A., Turker, T., Ucak, S., & Mosallam, A. (2015). Finite element model calibration of precast structures using ambient vibrations. Construction and Building Materials, 93, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.096

Paeglite, I., Smirnovs, J., & Paeglitis, A. (2017). Dynamic behavior of pre-stressed slab bridges. Procedia Engineering, 172, 831-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.132

Peeters, B., & De Roeck, G. (2001). Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 123(12), 659-667. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1410370

Sanayei, M., Khaloo, A., Gül, M., & Çatbas, N. F. (2015). Automated finite element model updating of a scale bridge model using measured static and modal test data. Engineering Structures, 102, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.029

Soyöz, S., Taciroğlu, E., Orakçal, K., Nigbor, R., Skolnik, D., Luş, H., & Şafak, E. (2013). Ambient and forced vibration testing of a reinforced concrete building before and after its seismic retrofitting. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139, 1741-1752. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000568

Ubertini, F., Gentile, C., & Materazzi, A. L. (2013). Automated modal dentification in operational conditions and its application to bridges. Engineering Structures, 46, 264-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.031

Zàrate, B. A., & Caicedo, J. M. (2008). Finite element model updating: multiple alternatives. Engineering Structures, 30, 3724-2430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.06.012

Downloads

Published

27.03.2018

How to Cite

Aras, F. (2018). Modal testing of an isolated overpass bridge in its construction stages. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 13(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2018.398