Analysis of Older Pedestrian Accidents: A Case Study of Lithuania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.465Keywords:
accidents, demographic change, elderly road users, mobility, pedestrians, road safety, roads, streetsAbstract
However, for several decades, Europe has been witnessing demographic ageing. As a result of these changes, a more significant number of elderly road users will be involved in future traffic, and therefore safe mobility management of the older will become an increasingly important issue. Various physical, sensory, and cognitive constraints affecting elderly road users lead to a rise in the likelihood of an accident, which, due to the increased physical vulnerability, cause more serious consequences of road accidents. The findings reported by the authors of an in-depth analysis of accidents for four years have demonstrated that the risk of road fatalities for elderly road users is by one fifth more significant than the average of all age groups, and the pedestrian plays the most critical role in road traffic. To adequately compensate for the observed age-related physiological changes, the authors discuss actions and road safety measures to ensure appropriate conditions for older pedestrians on the streets.References
Daniel, B., Pokriefke, E., & Risser, R. (2013). Road safety in the ageing societies– CONcerns and SOLutions.
Distefano, N., & Leonardi, S. (2019). Evaluation of the benefits of traffic calming on vehicle speed reduction. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 7(4), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2019.070403
Dommes, A. (2019). Street-crossing workload in young and older pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 128, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.018
Duim, E., Lebrão, M. L., & Antunes, J. L. F. (2017). Walking speed of older people and pedestrian crossing time. Journal of Transport & Health, 5, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.02.001
European Commission (2019). 2018 road safety statistics: what is behind the figures?
European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (2018). The 2018 Ageing Report. Economic & Budgetary Projections for the 28 EU Member States (2016–2070). 406 p.
European Commission, European Road Safety Observatory (2018). Pedestrians and Cyclists 2018. Report. 44 p.
Ewert, U. (2012). Faktenblatt Senioren als Fussgänger. Bern: BFU. (in German)
Gonzalo-Orden, H., Pérez-Acebo, H., Unamunzaga, A. L., & Arce, M. R. (2018). Effects of traffic calming measures in different urban areas. Transportation research procedia, 33, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.079
Institute of Transportation Engineers (2004). Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer. Briefing Sheet 8, FHWA.
Jasiūnienė, V., Ratkevičiūtė, K., & Peltola H. (2019). Road Network Safety Ranking Using Accident Prediction Models. In: Varhelyi, A., Žuraulis V., Prentkovskis O. (eds). Vision Zero for Sustainable Road Safety in Baltic Sea Region. VISZERO 2018. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham (pp. 166–176).
Kim, D. (2019). The transportation safety of elderly pedestrians: Modeling contributing factors to elderly pedestrian collisions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 131, 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.009
Marin-Lamelleta, C., & Haustein, S. (2015). Managing the safe mobility of older road users: How to cope with their diversity?. Journal of Transport & Health, 2, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.07.006
Mathieson, P., Dean, A., Goss, S., Farthing, D., & Hood, J. (2013). SaMERU-Safer mobility for elderly road users.
Oxley, J., Corben, B., Fildes, B., & Charlton, J. (2004, November). Older pedestrians: Meeting their safety and mobility needs. In Proceedings of the Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Perth, Australia (pp. 14–16).
Polders, E., Vlahogianni, E., Leopold, F., & Durso, C. (2015). ElderSafe-Risks and countermeasures for road traffic of elderly in Europe (No. MOVE/C4/2014-244). Brussels: European Commission–Directorate-General for mobility and transport (DG-MOVE).
Retting, R. A., Ferguson, S. A., & McCartt, A. T. (2003). A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1456–1463. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.9.1456
Sadrayi, A., Saffarzadeh, M., & Boroujerdian, A. M. (2016). An assessment of the impact of pedestrian refuge islands on vehicle speed changes and pedestrian safety: case study in Tehran. International journal of transportation engineering, 3(4), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.22119/ijte.2016.16180
Skučienė, D., Bartkus, A., Moskvina, J., & Uleckienė, A. (2015). Senėjanti visuomenė: Kaip mes pasirengę. Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras. 332 p. (in Lithuanian)
Uttley, J., & Fotios, S. (2017). The effect of ambient light condition on road traffic collisions involving pedestrians on pedestrian crossings. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 108, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.005
Webb, E. A., Bell, S., Lacey, R. E., & Abell, J. G. (2017). Crossing the road in time: Inequalities in older people’s walking speeds. Journal of Transport & Health, 5, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.02.009
Yannis, G.; Louca, G.; Vardaki, S.; Kanellaidis, G. (2013). Why do drivers exceed speed limits? European Transport Research Review, 5(3), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-013-0097-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Vilma Jasiūnienė, Donatas Čygas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
