Influence of Texture on Drainability, Splash and Spray in Flexible Pavements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2021-16.530Keywords:
drainability, mean profile depth (MPD), pavement, road, splash and spray, textureAbstract
Although the splash and spray phenomenon produced by heavy trucks on road pavements is not a significant issue in relation to traffic safety, it may cause considerable inconveniences for those driving cars or motorbikes. This paper addresses the issue of pavement engineering with regard to surface characteristics; particularly pavement texture and its influence on water mobilization and projection in conditions of wet weather and heavy traffic. Considering the theoretical concept of pavement macrotexture, the analysis starts with the hypothesis concerning a relationship between Mean Profile Depth (MPD) and water splashed during rain. In order to focus on the impact of texture on splash and spray, a field experiment was carried out to test the hypothesis using 5 test tracks on a range of different pavement textures. The experiment was performed using a Traffic Speed Drain Meter (TSDM), which is a new drainability survey device presented to PIARC for approval. This equipment employs the laser and image technology and allows one to simultaneously obtain MPD and water splash data. The results of drainability and MPD were compared for each test track. Having analysed the pavements with different MPD ranges in the experiment, it has been concluded that MPD and water splashed apparently have an inversely proportional relationship. In addition, the TSDM proved to be a suitable equipment (repeatability) at an affordable cost (high performance of data collection). Finally, it has been concluded that there is a way to reduce splash and spray adjusting the infrastructure rather trying to solve the issue modifying vehicle moving modes. Therefore, if the issue is properly addressed by civil engineers and road managers, road safety in the areas of heavy rain may be improved at an affordable cost. The experiment presented here is considered a starting point opening the path for further research.
References
Anderson, D. A., Huebner, R. S., Reed, J. R., Warner, J. C., & Henry, J. J. (1998). Improved Surface Drainage of Pavements. Final Report, PTI 9825. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w16.pdf
Ashton, M., & Baas, P. (1998). Spray and Wind Buffeting from Heavy Vehicles: A Literature Review.
Benatov, L. B., Pérez, F. E., & Miró, R. (2013). Sistema para la evaluación dinámica de la drenabilidad de pavimentos de carreteras mediante técnicas de visión artificial. Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas.
Briessinck, M., & Moffatt, M. (2017). State of the Art in Monitoring Road Condition. In Global Approaches on Sustainable Pavements. Permanent International Association of Road Congresses (PIARC).
Brochard, J., & Khoudeir, M. (2010). Device for Evaluation the State of Wetting of a Surface. United States Patent Office.
Campbell, J. D. (1984). Instrumentation for Measuring the Effectiveness of Truck Spray Supression Devices. Report No. UMTRI-84-27.
Chatfield, A. G., Reynolds, A. K., & Foot, D. J. (1979). Waterspray from Heavy Goods Vehicles: An Assessment of Some Vehicle Modifications. No. VSE513. https://trid.trb.org/view/148820
Eklund, L. E. (1991). Spray-Suppressant Splash Guard for Vehicles. United States Patent Office.
Escriba, S., & Jiménez, N. (2015). Medidor continuo de drenabilidad y permeabilidad in situ para pavimentos de carretera. Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas.
Flintsch, G. W. et al. (2014). Splash and Spray Assessment Tool Development Program.
Flintsch, G. W., Williams, B., Gibbons, R., & Viner, H. (2012). Assessment of the Impact of Splash and Spray on Road Users. Results of Controlled Experiment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2306(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.3141/2306-18
Koppa, R. J. et al. (1985). Heavy Truck Splash and Spray Testing: Phase II.
Koppa, R. J. et al. (1992). Aging Driver Needs for Mobility in an Automobile Oriented Region: 5 Research Studies. Report No. SWUTC/92/71242-2.
Marion, N. (1915). Mudguard for Automobiles and the Like. United States Patent Office.
Maycock, G. (1966). The Problem of Water Thrown up by Vehicles on Wet Roads. RRL Report No. 4.
Moffatt, M. (2016). SOTA Report on Road Condition Monitoring and Road/Vehicle Interaction. Proposals.
Mogrovejo, D. E., Flintsch, G. W., Katicha, S. W., de León Izeppi, E. D., & McGhee, K. K. (2016). Enhancing Pavement Surface Macrotexture Characterization by Using the Effective Area for Water Evacuation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2591(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.3141/2591-10
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1994). Splash and Spray Suppression: Technological Developments in the Design and Testing of Spray Reduction Devices for Heavy Trucks. Report to Congress DOT HS 808 085.
Pérez-Jiménez, F., Martínez, A., Sánchez-Domínguez, F., & Ramos-García, J. A. (2011). System for Measuring Splash on Wet Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2227(1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.3141/2227-19
Pike, A. M., Hawkins, H. G. J., & Carlson, P. J. (2007). Evaluating the Retroreflectivity of Pavement Markings Materials under Continuous Wetting Conditions, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.3141/2015-10
Pilkington, G. B. I. (1990). Splash and Spray. In W. Meyer & J. Reichert (Eds.), Surface Characteristics of Roadways (pp. 528–541). ASTM. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP23387S
Plocher, D. A. (2011). Experimental Investigation of Spray Development Inmediately Behind a Tire Rolling on a Wet Surface (PhD Thesis, University of Southern California).
Resendez, Y. A., Sandberg, U., Rasmussen, R. O., & Garber, S.(2007). Characterizing the Splash and Spray Potential of Pavements. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 11(6).
Ritter, T. E. (1974). Truck Splash and Spray Tests at Madras, Oregon. Report No. AR-955.
Rungruangvirojn, P., & Kanitpong, K. (2010a). Measurement of Visibility Loss Due to Splash and Spray: Porous, SMA and Conventional Asphalt Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11(6), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430903578945
Rungruangvirojn, P., & Kanitpong, K. (2010b). Measurement of Visibility Loss Due to Splash and Spray: The Comparison between Porous Asphalt, SMA and Conventional Asphalt Pavements. In TRB 2009 88th Annual Meeting (pp. 499–510). Transportation Research Board.
Sánchez Domínguez, F., Ramos García, J. A., & Álvarez Loranca, R. L. (2012). Systems and Tools for the Evaluation of Road Quality Indicators. In European Pavement and Asset Management Conference (EPAM). Sweden, Mälmo.
Sheppard, P. (1989). Review of Heavy Vehicle Spray Alleviation.
Society of Automobile Engineers. (2011). Recommended Practice for Splash and Spray Evaluation. No. J2245. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j2245_201105/
Srirangam, S. K., Anupam, K., Scarpas, A., Kasbergen, C., & Kane, M. (2014) Safety Aspects on Wet Asphalt Pavement Surfaces through Field and Numerical Modeling Investigations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2446(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.3141/2446-05
Takashi, C., Okihiko, H., & Yukio, I. (1994). Method and Apparatus for Testing Water Permeability Performance on Road Pavement. Japan Patent Office.
Tang, L., & Flintsch, G. W. (2015). Assessment of Splash and Spray Potential of Experimental Quiet Pavement Surfaces. Report No. VT 2012-01.
Tennent, T. (1886). Velocipede Skate. United States Patent Office.
Tromp, J. P. M. (1985). Splash and Spray by Lorries. Report No. R-85-5.
UNE 41201:2020 IN. Road and airfield surface characteristics. Procedure for measuring the sideway force coefficient (SFC) with SCRIM. Asociación Española de Normalización. https://www.une.org/encuentra-tu-norma/ busca-tu-norma/norma/?Tipo=N&c=N0064889
Weir, D. H., Ringland, R. F., Heffley, R. K., & Ashkenas, I. L. (1971). An Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Effect of Truck-Induced Aerodynamic Disturbances on Passenger Car Control and Performance. Report No. FHWA-RD-71-3.
Weir, D. H., Strange, J. F., & Heffley, R. K. (1978). Reduction of Adverse Aerodynamic Effects of Large Trucks Volume I. Report No. FHWA-RD-79-84. Federal Highway Administration.
Yu, B., & Sun, Y. (2018). Simulation of Impact of Water-Film Spray on Visibility. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part B: Pavements, 144(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/jpeodx.0000085
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jose Manuel Sanz Garcia, Manuel Romana Garcia, Jose Antonio Ramos Garcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
