RCM and AHP Hybrid Model for Road Network Maintenance Prioritization

Ena E. Orugbo, Babakalli M. Alkali, Anjali DeSilva, David K. Harrison


Category1 defects such as potholes significantly accelerate structural deterioration and pose imminent hazards on trunk road networks. Frequent occurrences of category1 defects have increased service disruptions on trunk road networks. Road maintenance agencies are now required to effectively prioritize trunk road network category1 defects maintenance works. However, existing road maintenance prioritization methods such as value engineering and traditional expert judgment methods have limitations. Value engineering is resource and time intensive thus best suited for project level prioritization and traditional expert judgments are subjective and lack audit trails. In an attempt to address the limitations of above methods, this study presents a Reliability Centered Maintenance and Analytical Hierarchy Process based hybrid model for trunk road network maintenance prioritization. The proposed hybrid model is used to establish failure diagnostic and Multi-criteria Decision Making respectively. As a case study, the hybrid model is implemented on a trunk road network in the United Kingdom. Relevant category1 defect failure information linked to trunk road network sub-assets are extracted from databases and relevant information elicited from maintenance experts. The criticality analysis results presented show the risk priority numbers of category1 defect related failures and cost effective preventative maintenance tasks are proposed. The Analytical Hierarchy Process results are used to address the complex prioritization process. The proposed hybrid model facilitates a systematic prioritization of a large number of trunk road network category1 defect failure maintenance activities consistently.


trunk road network; category1 defects; reliability centered maintenance; multi-criteria decision making; analytical hierarchy process

Full Text:



Audit Scotland. 2011. Maintaining Scotland Roads: A Follow up report prepared for the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission. Edinburgh: Audit Scotland, 31 p. ISBN 9781907916151.

Belton, V.; Stewart, T. J. 2002. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer. ISBN 079237505X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4

Cavalcante, C. A. V.; Costa, A. P. C. S. 2006. Multicriteria Model of Preventive Maintenance, Brazilian Journal or Operations & Production Management 3(1): 71‒86.

Clark, J. A. 1999. Value Engineering for Small Transportation Projects: Ms Thesis. Worcester, MA: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 157 p.

Coyle, G. 2004. Practical Strategy: Structured Tools and Techniques. Harlow: Prentice Hall/Financial Times, 336 p.

De la Garza, J. M.; Akyildiz, S.; Bish, D. R.; Krueger, D. A. 2011. Network-level Optimization of Pavement Maintenance Renewal Strategies, Advanced Engineering Informatics 25(4): 699–712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.08.002

Deshpande, V. S.; Modak, J. P. 2002. Application of RCM to a Medium Scale Industry, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 77(1): 31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00011-X

DFT 2001. Inspection and Maintenance of Traffic Signs on Motorway and All-Purpose Trunk Roads. Vol. 8(2). TD 25/01. Department for Transport, London, UK.

Dijkstra, T. K. 2010. On the Extraction of Weights from Pairwise Comparison Matrices, Central European Journal of Operations Research 21: 103–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10100-011-0212-9

Farhan, J.; T. F. Fwa, 2009. Pavement Maintenance Prioritization Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Transportation Research Record 2093: 12–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2093-02

Forman, E. H.; Gass, S. I. 2001. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: an Exposition, Operations Research 49(4): 469–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231

Ishizaka, A.; Labib, A. 2011. Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Expert Systems with Applications 38(11): 14336–14345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa. 2011.04.143

Ishizaka, A.; Labib, A. 2009. Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and Limitations, OR Insight 22: 201– 220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ori.2009.10

Labib, A.; O’Connor, R.; Williams, G. 1998. An Intelligent Maintenance Model (System): An Application of AHP and a Fuzzy Logic Rule-based Controller, Journal of the Operational Research Society 49(7): 745–757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jors.2600542

Moubray, J. 1997. Reliability Centered Maintenance. 2nd edition. New York: Industrial Press Inc., 448 p.

Ohakwe, J.; Iwueze, I. S.; Chikezie, D. C. 2011. Analysis of Road Traffic Accidents in Nigeria: A Case Study of Obinze/Nekede/Iheagwa Road in Imo State, Southeastern, Nigeria, Asian Journal of Applied Sciences 4: 166–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajaps.2011.166.175

Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 287 p.

Taghipour, S.; Banjevic, D.; Jardine, A. K. S. 2010. Prioritization of Medical Equipment for Maintenance Decisions, Journal of the Operational Research Society 62(9): 1666–1687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.106

WHO, 2004. World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention: Summary. Geneva: World Health Organization, 66 p.

The Swedish Transport Administration. 2010. Annual Report 2010. Borlänge, Sweden: The Swedish Transport Administration, 88 p.

DOI: 10.3846/bjrbe.2015.23


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press Technika