Simulation for Selecting Road Works Equipment
Abstract
Keywords: |
roadwork planning; repaving; queuing model; simulation; CYCLONE; optimization
|
Full Text: |
References
Abduh, M.; Shanti, F.; Pratama, A. 2010. Simulation of Construction Operation: Search for a Practical and Effective Simulation System for Construction Practitioners, in Proc. of the 1st Makassar International Conference on Civil Engineering (MICCE2010), 9–10 March 2012, Makassar, Indonesia: 1311–1319. Available from Internet: http://www.ftsl.itb.ac.id/kk/manajemen dan_rekayasa_konstruksi/wp-content/ uploads/2010/10/ma-micce.pdf.
Biruk, S.; Jaskowski, P. 2008. Simulation Modelling Construction Project with Repetitive Tasks Using Petri Nets Theory, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(3): 219–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.219-226
Cheng, T.; Feng, Ch. 2003. An Effective Simulation Mechanism for Construction Operations, Automation in Construction 12(3): 227–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(02)00086-9
Cheng, T.; Wu, H.–T.; Tseng, Y.–W. 2000. Construction Operation Simulation Tool – COST, in Proc. of the S17th IAARC/ CIB/IEEE/IFAC/IFR International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), 18–20 September 2000, Taipei, Taiwan, 1143–1146.
Ghoddousi, P.; Hosseini, M. R. 2012. A Survey of the Factors Affecting the Productivity of Construction Projects in Iran, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(1): 99–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.661203
Halpin, D. W. 1977. CYCLONE – Method for Modeling Job Site Processes, Journal of the Construction Division 103(3): 489–499.
Halpin, D. W.; Jen, H.; Kim, J. 2003. A Construction Process Simulation Web Service, in Proc. of the 35th Winter Simulation Conference, vol 2. Ed. by Chick, S.; Sánchez, P. J.; Ferrin, D.; Morrice, D. J., 7–10 December 2003, New Orleans, USA, 1503–1509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2003.1261595
Han, Z.; Liu, P. 2011. A Fuzzy Multi–Attribute Decision–Making Method under Risk with Unknown Attribute Weights, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2): 246–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.580575
Jaskowski, P.; Sobotka, A. 2012. Using Soft Precedence Relations for Reduction of the Construction Project Duration, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(2): 262–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.666217
Jaskowski, P.; Biruk, S. 2011. The Method for Improving Stability of Construction Project Schedules through Buffer Allocation, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(3): 429–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.580587
Keršulienė, V.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Integrated Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Architect Selection, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(4): 645–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.635718
Martinez, J. C. 2001. EZStrobe-General-Purpose Simulation System Based on Activity Cycle Diagrams, in Proc. of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, 9–12 December 2001, Arlington, USA, 1556–1564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2001.977485
Napalkova, L.; Merkuryeva, G. 2012. Multi-Objective Stochastic Simulation-Based Optimisation Applied to Supply Chain Planning, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(1): 132–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.661190
Özgün, O.; Barlas, Y. 2009. Discrete vs. Continuous Simulation: When Does it Matter?, in Proc. of the 27th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 26–30 July 2009, Albuquerque, NM, USA. Available from Internet: http://www.systemdy- namics.org/conferences/2009/proceed/papers/P1199.pdf.
Paslawski, J. 2011. Flexibility as Risk Management Option Implemented in the Bridge Repair, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 6(4): 258–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.33
Roy, R. K.; Mohapatra, P. K. J. 1993. A System Dynamics Based Methodology for Numerically Solving Transient Behaviour of Queuing Systems, in Proc. of the International System Dynamics Conference, ed. by Zepeda, E.; Machuca, J. A. D., July 1993, Cancun, Mexico, 408–418. Available from Internet: http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/1993/proceed/ roy408.pdf.
Stanujkic, D.; Magdalinovic, N.; Jovanovic, R.; Stojanovic, S. 2012. An Objective Multi-Criteria Approach to Optimization Using MOORA Method and Interval Grey Numbers, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(2): 331– 363. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.676996
Zolfani, S. H.; Sedaghat, M; Zavadskas, E. K. 2012. Performance Evaluating of Rural ICT Centers (Telecenters), Applying Fuzzy AHP, SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey, a Case Study in Iran, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(2): 364–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.685110
DOI: 10.3846/bjrbe.2015.27
Cited-By
1. Simulation-based multi-objective optimization model for machinery allocation in shallow foundation
Kamal Jaafar, Laith Ishaq El-Halawani
International Journal of Construction Management first page: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1827693
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press Technika