Evaluation Criteria of Smart City Mobility System Using MCDM Method

Simona Zapolskytė, Marija Burinskienė, Martin Trépanier

Abstract


While many cities around the world qualify themselves as “smart cities”, there is no comprehensive way to evaluate to what extent they are “smart”. This article proposes a framework for comparison of the level of “smartness” of the urban mobility systems. The most relevant indicators that have the greatest impact on smart mobility systems were selected in the course of literature review. The impact of indicators on smart mobility systems is variable. Evaluating smart mobility systems, different authors distinguish between different indicators, which usually do not duplicate. The paper categorizes the indicators of the smart mobility system into five groups, called “factors”: motor travel and congestion reduction measures; pollution reduction measures; travel safety and accident reduction measures; traffic management tools and services; smart infrastructure measures. A number of indicators are attributed to each of the listed groups. A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making method, namely, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, has been used to evaluate the significance of the smartness level used in the research. This method bases the weighting of subjective criteria on expert judgement. Rank correlation is used to determine the consistency of expert opinions. A model has been developed to compare smart mobility systems of individual cities and their infrastructure.


Keywords:

benchmarking; intelligent infrastructure; multicriteria analysis; smart city mobility system; smartness index

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092

Battarra, R., Gargiulo, C., Tremiterra, M. R., & Zucaro, F. (2018). Smart Mobility in Italian Metropolitan Cities: A Comparative Analysis Through Indicators and Actions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 556–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.006

Benevolo, C., Dameri, R. P., & D’Auria, B. (2016). Smart Mobility in Smart City. Action Taxonomy, ICT Intensity and Public Benefits. In T. Torre, A. M. Braccini & R. Spinelli (Eds.), Empowering Organizations. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation (vol. 11, pp. 13–28). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23784-8_2

Bhandari, S. B., & Nalmpantis, D. (2018). Application of Various Multiple Criteria Analysis Methods for the Evaluation of Rural Road Projects. The Open Transportation Journal, 12, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801812010057

Biswas, T., Chatterjee, P., & Choudhuri, B. (2020). Selection of Commercially Available Alternative Passenger Vehicle in Automotive Environment. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta200113b

Boselli, R., Cesarini, M., Mercorio, F., & Mezzanzanica, M. (2015). Applying the AHP to Smart Mobility Services: A Case Study. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Data Management Technologies and Applications (KomIS-2015). France, Alsace, Colmar.

Broniewicz, E., & Ogrodnik, K. (2020). Multi-Criteria Analysis of Transport Infrastructure Projects. Transportation Research Part D, 83, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102351

Castillo, H., & Pitfield, D. E. (2010). ELASTIC – A Methodological Framework for Identifying and Selecting Sustainable Transport Indicators. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(4), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.002

Debnath, A. K., Chin, H. C., Haque, M. M., & Yuen, B. (2014). A Methodological Framework for Benchmarking Smart Transport Cities. Cities, 37, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.11.004

Deluka-Tibljaš, A., Karleuša, B., & Dragičević, N. (2013). Review of Multicriteria-Analysis Methods Application in Decision Making About Transport Infrastructure. Građevinar, 65(7), 619–631. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.850.2013

Dudzevičiūtė, G., Šimelytė, A., & Liučvaitienė, A. (2017). The Application of Smart Cities Concept for Citizens of Lithuania and Sweden: Comperative Analysis. Independent Journal of Management & Production (IJM&P), 8(4), 1433–1450. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i4.659

Erdogan, M., & Kaya, I. (2019). Prioritizing Failures by Using Hybrid Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodology With a Real Case Application. Sustainable Cities and Society, 45, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.027

Farooq, A., Xie, M., Stoilova, S., & Ahmad, F. (2019). Multicriteria Evaluation of Transport Plan for High-Speed Rail: An Application to Beijing-Xiongan. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8319432

Garau, C., Masala, F., & Pinna, F. (2016). Cagliari and Smart Urban Mobility: Analysis and Comparison. Cities, 56, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.012

Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Karmar, H., & Meijers, L. (2007). Smart Cities Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Final report. Edited by the Centre of Regional Science. Vienna UT. Retrieved from www.smart-cities.eu

Hajduk, S. (2016). The Concept of a Smart City in Urban Management. Business, Management and Education, 14(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2016.319

Hall, R. E., Bowerman, B., Braverman, J., Taylor, J., Todosow, H., & Von Wimmersperg, U. (2000). The Vision of a Smart City. In 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop. Paris, 28 September 2000. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241977644_The_vision_of_a_ smart_city

Kicinski, M., & Solecka, K. (2018). Application of MCDA/MCDM methods for an integrated urban public transportation system – case study, city of Cracow. Archives of Transport, 46(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.2107

Krmac, E., & Djordjević, B. (2019). Evaluation of the TCIS Influence on the Capacity Utilization Using the TOPSIS Method: Case Studies of Serbian and Austrian Railways. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta1901030k

Litman, T. (2008). Sustainable Transportation Indicators: A Recommended Research Program for Developing Sustainable Transportation Indicators and Data. Sustainable Transportation Indicators Subcommittee of the Transportation Research Board. Retrieved from https://www.vtpi.org/sustain/sti.pdf

Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., Jusoh, A., & MD Nor, K. (2016). Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques in Transportation Systems: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature. Transport, 31(3), 359–385. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1121517

Marsal-Llacuna, M. L., Colomer-Llina`s. J., & Mele´ndez-Frigola, J. (2014). Lessons in Urban Monitoring Taken From Sustainable and Livable Cities to Better Address the Smart Cities Initiative. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.012

Miloševi´c, M. R., Miloševi´c, D. M., Stevi´c, D. M., & Stanojevi´c, A. D. (2019). Smart City: Modeling Key Indicators in Serbia Using IT2FS. Sustainability, 11(13), 3536. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133536

Moreira, M. P., Dupont, C. J., & Vellasco, M. M. B. R. (2009). PROMETHEE and Fuzzy PROMETHEE Multicriteria Methods for Ranking Equipment Failure Modes. In 2009 15th International Conference on Intelligent System Applications to Power. https://doi.org/10.1109/isap.2009.5352823

Orlowski, A., & Romanowska, P. (2019). Smart Cities Concept: Smart Mobility Indicator. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 50(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2019.1565120

Papa, E., & Lauwers, D. (2015). Smart Mobility: Opportunity or Threat to Innovate Places and Cities. In 20th International Conference on Urban Planning and Regional Development in the Information Society (pp. 534–550). Retrieved from https://conference.corp.at/

Podvezko, V., & Podviezko, A. (2014). Kriterijų reikšmingumo nustatymo metodai [Methods of estimation of weights]. Lietuvos matematikos rinkinys [Lithuanian mathematics collection], 55, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.15388/LMR.B.2014.21

Podvezko, V., Sivilevicius, H., & Podviezko, A. (2014). Scientific Applications of the AHP Method in Transport Problems. The Archives of Transport, 29(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1146966

Reiber, L., & Huang, G. (2018). Comparing Study on Smart City Strategies in Berlin and Shanghai. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 56, 419–422. https://doi.org/10.2991/febm-18.2018.96

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill. 287 p.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision Making With the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.

Simanavičienė, R., & Ustinovičius, L. (2011). Daugiatikslių sprendimo priėmimo metodų jautrumo analizė taikant Monte Karlo modeliavimą. Informacijos mokslai, 56, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2011.0.3138

Sivilevičius, H. (2011). Application of Expert Evaluation Method to Determine the Importance of Operating Asphalt Mixing Plant Quality Criteria and Rank Correlation. The Baltic journal of road and bridge engineering, 6(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.07

Stanković, M., Gladović, P., & Popović, V. (2019). Determining the Importance of the Criteria of Traffic Accessibility Using Fuzzy AHP and Rough AHP Method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901086s

Turcksin, L., Bernardini, A., & Macharis, C. (2011). A Combined AHP-PROMETHEE Approach for Selecting the Most Appropriate Policy Scenario to Stimulate a Clean Vehicle Fleet. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 954–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104

Vukovic, N., Rzhavtsev, A., & Shmyrev, V. (2019). Smart City: The Case Study of Saint-Peterburg 2019. International Review, (1-2), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.5937/intrev1901015v

Wibowo, S., & Grandhi, S. (2015). A Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Benchmarking Smart Transport Cities. Science and Information Conference. London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1109/sai.2015.7237131

Zhu, S., Lia, D., & Fengc, H. (2019). Is Smart City Resilient? Evidence From China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636




DOI: 10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.501

Cited-By

1. Assessment of Sustainable Mobility by MCDM Methods in the Science and Technology Parks of Vilnius, Lithuania
Simona Zapolskytė, Vaida Vabuolytė, Marija Burinskienė, Jurgita Antuchevičienė
Sustainability  vol: 12  issue: 23  first page: 9947  year: 2020  
doi: 10.3390/su12239947

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Simona Zapolskytė, Marija Burinskienė, Martin Trépanier

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.