Implementation of Experimental Research in Road Traffic: Тheory and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.101-108Keywords:
parameters of traffic flow, methods for the implementation of the experiment, evolutionary experiment, planning of the experimentAbstract
The article describes the questions of experimental researches in road traffic and possible alternatives for the implementation of the experiment. Evolutionary planning is suggested as the basic planning of the experiment. Some results are given from the research of the main parameter – volume of traffic flows. Satisfactory management is far from optimal management and huge reserves are still available here. The problems of collecting data on the parameters of traffic flow have been studied by many researchers. In this article authors also tried in a certain way to enlighten a number of questions related to the implementation and planning of experimental researches in the field of road traffic.
References
Blaeij, A.; Florax, R.; Rietveld, P.; Verhoef, E. 2003. The value of statistical life in road safety: a meta-analysis accident, Analysis Prevention 35(6): 973–986.
Brilon, W. 2002. Unsignalized intersection – a third method for analysis, in Proc of the 15th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Ed. by Taylor M. A. P. July 16–18, 2002, Adelaide, Australia. Pergamon, 157–178. ISBN 10 0080439268.
Davis, G. A. 2004. Possible aggregation biases in road safety research and a mechanism approach to crash modeling, Accident Analysis Prevention 36(6): 1119–1127.
Hauer, E. 2002. Fishing for safety information in the Murky Waters of research reports [CD-ROM], in 81st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting: paper prepared for presentation in session 539 “Critically Assessing the Results of Safety Studies”. Jan 13–17, 2002. Washington DC.
Kapski, D.; Leonovich, I.; Ratkevičiūtė, K. 2007. Theoretical principles of forecasting accident rate on the conflict sections of the cities by the method of potential danger, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 2(3): 133–140.
Viteikienė, M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2007. Evaluating the sustainability of Vilnius city residential areas, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 13(2): 149–155.
Врубель, Ю. 1996. Организация дорожного движения [Vrubel, J. Trafic arrangement]. Mинск. 326 с.
Врубель, Ю. 2003. Потери в дорожном движении [Vrubel, J. Losses concerning road accidents]. Минск: РИО БНТУ. 380 с. ISBN 985-6529-66-2.
Врубель, Ю.; Капский Д.; Кот, Е. 2006. Определение потерь в дорожном движении [Vrubel, J.; Kapski, D.; Kot, E. Definition of the losses concerning traffic accidents]. Минск: РИО БНТУ. 252 с. ISBN 985-479-493-8.
Иванов, А. З. 1966. Использование дополнительной информации при проведении эволюционного планирования эксперимента [Ivanov, A. Z. Usage of additional information when performing evolutional planning of the experiment]. Mинск: Наука, 96–110.
Леонович, И. И.; Богданович, С. В.; Жилинский, В. И. 2007. Прогнозирование зимней скользкости автомобильных дорог [Leonovich, I. I.; Bogdanovich, S. V.; Zilinskij, V. I. Making prognosis on street sleeperness during winter time], Научно-технический журнал «Вестник БНТУ» [Technology and Science Magazine “Vestnik BNTU”]1: 50–55.
Михайлов, А. Ю.; Головных, И. М. 2004. Современные тенденции проектирования и реконструкции улично-дорожных сетей городов [Mixailov, A. J.; Golovnyx, I. M. Modern trends of desing and reconstruction of urban roads network]. Новосибирск: Наука. 267 p. ISBN 5–02–032091–9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press Technika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
