Policy Instruments for Managing EU Road Safety Targets: Road Safety Impact Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2012.09Keywords:
road safety impact assessment, road safety, road safety measures, infrastructure project, initial planning or design stageAbstract
The Directive 2008/96/EC of European Parliament and of the Council requires the establishment and implementation of procedures relating to road safety impact assessments, road safety audits, the management of road network safety and safety inspections by the Member States. Directive aims to develop procedures with the aim of increasing safety of road infrastructures. Road Safety Impact Assessment (RSIA) is an initial part of road infrastructure safety management systems. This article describes the scope of RSIA procedures, provides detailed recommendations on qualification of auditors, implementation and execution of procedures for the EU Member States. Road safety should play an important role when routes are being selected and safety awareness should be included in the decision making during the designing/planning stage. RSIA is a very beneficial tool that could increase transparency and availability of information, consequently, it leads all parties concerned to well-informed decisions.
References
Eenink, R.; Reuring, M.; Elvik, R.; Cardoso, J.; Wichert, S.; Stefan, Ch. 2008. Accident Prediction Models and Road Safety Impact Assessment: Recommendations for Using These Tools. [cited 16 August, 2011]. Available from Internet http://ripcord.bast.de/pdf/RIPCORD-ISEREST-Deliverable-D2-Final.pdf
Elvik, R. 2001. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Road Safety Measures: Applicability and Controversies, Accident Analysis and Prevention 33(1): 9–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00010-5
Elvik, R. 2009. An Exploratory Analysis of Models for Estimating the Combined Effects of Road Safety Measures, Accident Analysis and Prevention 41(4): 876–880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.05.003
Elvik, R. 2010. Strengthening Incentives for Efficient Road Safety Policy Priorities: the Roles of Cost–Benefit Analysis and Road Pricing, Journal of Safety Science 48(9): 1189–1196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.005
Elvik, R. 2011. Assessing Causality in Multivariate Accident Models, Accident Analysis and Prevention 43(1): 253–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.018
Peltola, H. 2000. Background and Principles of the Finnish Safety Evaluation Tool, TARVA, in Proc. of the 13th ICTCT Workshop “Evaluation of Traffic Safety Measures”. October 26–27, 2000, Corfu, Greece [cited 20 August, 2011]. Available from Internet: http://www.ictct.org/workshop.php?workshop_nr=14
Qiong, B.; Da, R.; Yongjun, Sh.; Hermans, E. 2010. Creating a Composite Road Safety Performance Index by a Hierarchical Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach, in Proc. of the International Conference “Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE)”. November 15–16, 2010, Hangzhou, China [cited 28 November, 2011]. Available from Internet: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5680828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISKE.2010.5680828
Ratkevičiūtė, K. 2010. Model for the Substantiation of Road Safety Improvement Measures on the Roads of Lithuania, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 5(2): 116–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2010.17
Stipdonk, H.; Wesemann, P.; Ale, B. 2010. The Expected Number of Road Traffic Casualties Using Stratified Data, Safety Science 48(9): 1123–1133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.010
Veisten, K.; Elvik, R.; Bax, Ch. 2010. Assessing Conceptions of Cost-Benefit Analysis among Road Safety Decision-Makers: Misunderstandings or Disputes? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 28(1): 57–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/146155110X488790
Wang, Y.; Bai, H.; Xiang, X. 2011. Traffic Safety Performance Assessment and Multivariate Treatments for Intersection Locations, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 6(1): 30–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.05
Wegman, F. C. M.; Roszbach, R.; Mulder, J. A. G.; Schoon, C. C.; Poppe, F. 1994. Road Safety Impact Assessment. R-94-20 [cited 6 Ferbruary, 2012] Leidschendam: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research. 40 p. Available from Internet: http://www.swov.nl/rapport/R-94-20.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press Technika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.