Evaluation of Climatic Factors Based on the Mechanistic -Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Authors

  • Daiva Žilionienė Dept of Roads, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Mario De Luca Dept of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Napoli Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, Italy
  • Gianluca Dell’Acqua Dept of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Napoli Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2013.20

Keywords:

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, pavement design, weather, climate model calibration

Abstract

In this paper procedure for evaluating the effects of climate on pavement performance in Italy is proposed. To characterize the Italian territory nine different simulated scenarios have been used. These scenarios were obtained by combining three different situations of latitude (North, Central and South) with three conditions of altitude (high, medium, low altitude). For each of these scenarios, some configurations, proposed by the Italian CNR road pavement design catalogue with medium and high traffic flow, were verified using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide. The results obtained showed that the Italian CNR road pavement design catalogue has a limited reliability.

References

Ahn, S.; Kandala, S.; Uzan, J.; El-Basyouny, M. 2011. Impact of Traffic Data on the Pavement Distress Predictions Using the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Road Materials and Pavement Design 12(1): 195–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2011.9690359

Dell’Acqua, G.; De Luca, M.; Lamberti, R. 2011. Indirect Skid Resistance Measurement for Porous Asphalt Pavement Management, Transportation Research Record 2205: 147–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2205-19

Gaurav, G.; Wojtkiewicz, S. F.; Khazanovich, L. 2011. Optimal Design of Flexible Pavements Using a Framework of Dakota and MEPDG, International Journal of Pavement Engineering 12(2): 137–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2010.535535

Kim, S.; Ceylan, H.; Gopalakrishnan, K. 2007. Effect of M-E Design Guide Inputs on Flexible Pavement Performance Predictions, Road Materials and Pavement Design 8(3): 375–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2007.9690080

Mogawer, W. S.; Austerman, A. J.; Daniel, J. S.; Zhou, F.; Bennert, T. 2011. Evaluation of the Effects of Hot Mix Asphalt Density on Mixture Fatigue Performance, Rutting Performance and MEPDG Distress Predictions, International Journal of Pavement Engineering 12(2): 161–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2010.546857

Paterson, W. D. 1986. International Roughness Index: Relationship to Other Measures of Roughness and Riding Quality, Transportation Research Record 1084: 49–59.

Pasquini, E.; Canestrari, F.; Cardone, F.; Santagata, F. A. 2011. Performance Evaluation of Gap Graded Asphalt Rubber Mixtures, Construction and Building Materials 25(4): 2014–2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.048

Wojtkiewicz, S. F.; Khazanovich, L.; Gaurav, G. 2010. Probabilistic Numerical Simulation of Pavement Performance Using MEPDG, Road Materials and Pavement Design 11(2): 291–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2010.9690277

Downloads

Published

27.09.2013

How to Cite

Žilionienė, D., De Luca, M., & Dell’Acqua, G. (2013). Evaluation of Climatic Factors Based on the Mechanistic -Empirical Pavement Design Guide. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 8(3), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2013.20