Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach to Network Bridge Management

Maria Grazia Augeri; Rosario Colombrita; Salvatore Greco; Paola Sapienza

doi:10.3846/bjrbe.2014.05

Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach to Network Bridge Management

Authors

Maria Grazia Augeri Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Catania, viale Andrea Doria, 6, Catania, 95125 Italy
Rosario Colombrita Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Catania, viale Andrea Doria, 6, Catania, 95125 Italy
Salvatore Greco Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Catania, viale Andrea Doria, 6, Catania, 95125 Italy
Paola Sapienza Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Catania, viale Andrea Doria, 6, Catania, 95125 Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2014.05

Keywords:

decision support systems, multiple criteria decision analysis, dominance-based rough sets, decision-making, bridge management, network bridge level

Abstract

Bridge management is essential for optimizing available resources. Prioritising maintenance and assessing the effectiveness of different maintenance strategies are based on the conventional condition ratings of bridge components. This paper presents the development of a Decision Support System for maintenance management at the Network Bridge Level, based on the theory of the Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach. Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach produces a decision model expressed in terms of easily understandable “if…, then…” decision rules which control the decision process and avoid the “black box” effects of many alternative decision support methods. In the proposed Decision Support System, bridges are described by a set of 16 parameters that describe the state of degradation, structure, territory, traffic and network characteristics. To illustrate this Decision Support System, a case study involving Italian roads is presented. The proposed Decision Support System is a flexible tool because it allows updating parameters periodically as a consequence of practice, expertise and management policies.

References

Bevc, L.; Peruš, I.; Mahut, B.; Grefstad, K. 2001. Review of Existing Procedures for Optimisation. Deliverable D3 BRIME. Website: <http://www.trl.co.uk/brime/deliver.htm>

Bevc, L.; Mahut, B.; Grefstad, K. 1999. Review of Current Practice for Assessment of Structural Condition and Classification of Defects. Deliverable D2 BRIME. Website: <http://www.trl.co.uk/brime/deliver.htm>

Elbehairy, H.; Hegazy, T.; Soudki, K. 2009. Integrated Multiple- Element Bridge Management System, Journal of Bridge Engineering 14(3): 179–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:3(179)

Estes, A. C.; Frangopol, D. M. 2003. Updating Bridge Reliability Based on Bridge Management System Visual Inspection Results, Journal of Bridge Engineering 8(6): 374–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:6(374)

Frangopol, D. M.; Kong, J. S.; Gharaibeh, E. S. 2001. Reliability- Based Life-Cycle Management of Highway Bridges, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 15(1): 27–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2001)15:1(27)

Godart, B.; Vassie, P. R. 2001. Bridge Management Systems: Extended Review of Existing Systems and Outline Framework For A European Systems. Deliverable D13 BRIME. Website: <http://www.trl.co.uk/brime/deliver.htm>

Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. 2005. Decision Rule Approach, in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Ed. by Figueira, J.; Greco, S.; Ehrgott, M. New York: Springer-Verlag, 507–562.

Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. 2002a. Rough Approximation by Dominance Relations, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 17(2): 153–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/int.10014

Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. 2002b. Multicriteria Classification by Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach, in Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Ed. by Zyt, J.; Klosgen, W.; Zytkow, J. M. Oxford University Press, New York, 2002. 1064 p. ISBN 0195118316.

Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. 2001. Rough Sets Theory for Multicriteria Decision Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 129(1): 1–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00167-3

Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R. 1999. The Use of Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets in MCDM, International Series in Operations Research  Management Science 21: 397–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5025-9_14

Hai, D. T. 2008. Computerized Database for Maintenance and Management of highway Bridges in Vietnam, Journal of Bridge Engineering 13(3): 245–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:3(245)

Liu, M.; Frangopol, D. M. 2004. Optimal Bridge Maintenance Planning Based on Probabilistic Performance Prediction, Engineering Structures 26(7): 991–1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.003

Liu, M.; Frangopol, D. M. 2005. Multiobjective Maintenance Planning Optimization for Deteriorating Bridges Considering Condition, Safety, and Life-Cycle Cost, Journal of Structural Engineering 131(5): 833–842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(833)

Liu, M.; Frangopol, D. M. 2006. Probability-Based Bridge Network Performance Evaluation, Journal of Bridge Engineering 11(5): 633–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(633)

Miyamoto, A.; Kawamura, K.; Nakamura, H. 2001. Development of a Bridge Management System for Existing Bridges, Advances in Engineering Software 32(10‒11): 821–833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(01)00034-5

Neves, L. C.; Frangopol, D. M. 2004. Condition, Safety and Cost Profiles for Deteriorating Structures with Emphasis on Bridges, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 89(2): 185–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.08.018

Neves, L. C.; Frangopol, D. M.; Cruz, P. J. S. 2006. Probabilistic Lifetime-Oriented Multiobjective Optimization of Bridge Maintenance: Single Maintenance Type, Journal of Structural Engineering 132(6): 991–1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:6(991)

Orcesi, A. D.; Cremona, C. F. 2011. Optimization of Maintenance Strategies for the Management of the National Bridge Stock in France, Journal of Bridge Engineering 16(1): 44–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000125

Pawlak, Z. 1991. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell, MA, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3534-4

Rens, K. L.; Nogueira, C. L.; Transue, D. J 2005. Bridge Management and Nondestructive Evaluation, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 19(1): 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:1(3)

Slowinski, R.; Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B. 2005. Rough Set Based Decision Support, in Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques. Ed. by Burke, E.; Kendall, G. New York: Springer-Verlag, 475–527.

Stefanowski, J. 1998. On Rough Set Based Approaches to Induction of Decision Rules, in Rough Sets in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Ed. by Skowron, A.; Polkowski, L.; Physica-Verlag. Heidelberg 1998, 500–529.

Valenzuela, S.; De Solminihac, H.; Echaveguren, T. 2010. Proposal of an Integrated Index for Prioritization of Bridge Maintenance, Journal of Bridge Engineering 15(3): 337–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000068

Woodward, R. J.; Cullington, D. W.; Daly, A. F.; Vassie, P. R.; Haardt, P.; Kashner, R.; Astudillo, R.; Velando, C.; Godart, B.; Cremona, C.; Mahut, B.; Raharinaivo, A.; Lau; Markey, I.; Bevc, L.; Peruš, I. 2001. Deliverable D14 BRIME. Deliverable D14 Final Report. Website: <http://www.trl.co.uk/brime/de-liver.htm>

Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach to Network Bridge Management

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

How to Cite