Alternative Formula for Rigid Pavement Stress Calculation in Corner Load Conditions




Westergaard solutions, rigid pavements, concrete slab, FE analysis, corner load conditions, stress calculation


The design of rigid pavements is historically based on the classical Theory of proposed by Westergaard in 1929, which considers the rigid pavement as a thin plate resting on an elastic ground with a Winkler reaction, imposing the congruence of vertical displacements at the points of contact between the pavement structure and the ground. Westergaard’s Theory provides expressions for the calculation of maximum stress in concrete slabs for interior, edge and corner load conditions. This work focuses on the development of a Finite Element model, implemented in the ANSYS® environment and calibrated on the basis of the results of the in-scale experimental model developed by Lall and Lees in 1983. The implementation of the FE model was performed through a set of steps capable of reproducing physical and mechanical conditions of the true model, which was further intended to be used for numerical analysis. After the FE model was developed, it was possible to carry out multiple simulations pursuing three main aims: to evaluate the effect of the variation of material properties on the slab stress state, to compare the maximum stresses for the interior and edge load conditions considering Westergaard’s Theory, the experimental data and the results of the numerical model, and to use the developed and calibrated model to formulate an alternative mathematical expression, which would allow calculating the stress in corner load conditions.


AASHTO (1993). Guide for design of pavement structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, DC, USA.

Agostinacchio, M., Ciampa, D., & Olita, S. (2016a). Performance Assessment of JPCP and CRCP Rigid Pavements Implementing M-E Analysis. In: Chabot A., Buttlar W., Dave E., Petit C., Tebaldi G. (eds) 8th RILEM International Conference on Mechanisms of Cracking and Debonding in Pavements. RILEM Bookseries, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 417–423.

Agostinacchio, M., Ciampa, D., Olita, S., & Simonetti, M. (2016b). The use of steel mesh reinforcement for the cracking control in flexible pavements: FE analysis in static and dynamic conditions. Functional Pavement Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Chinese-European Workshop on Functional Pavement Design, 4th CEW 2016, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 229–238.

Al-Ghafri, I. H. H., & Javid, M. A. (2018). Comparative analysis of rigid pavement using Westergaard method and computer program. Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering, 2(2), 19–30.

ANSYS® References manual (2020). Retrieved from

Applied Research Associates Inc. (ARA) & ERES Consultants Division (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Final Rep., NCHRP Project 1-37A.0.

Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design (second edition). Pearson Prentice Hall, USA.

Ioannides, A. M., Thompson, M. R., & Baremberg, E. J. (1985). Westergaard solutions reconsidered. In TRB No 1043. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Retrieved from trr/1985/1043/1043-003.pdf

Jeuffroy, G. (1955). Considerations theoriques sur le calcul des chaussées en béton. Revue Générale Routes et Aérodromes.

Lall, B. (1969). Concrete overlay of concrete pavement. Dissertation, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.

Lall, B., & Lees, G. (1983). Analysis of stresses in overlay-pavement-earth systems. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Washington D.C.).

Maske, N. A., Anandkumar, A., & Majumder, A. (2013). Analysis of rigid pavement stresses by finite element method & Westergaard’s method by varying sub-grade soil properties. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 2(3). Retrieved from¬4d9e0cff9ad53701589ec93bfdbbf4ffe.pdf

Pickett, G. (1951). A study of stresses in the corner of concrete pavement slabs under large corner loads. Chicago: Portland Cement Association.

Pickett, G., & Ray, G. K. (1951). Influence charts for concrete pavement. Transaction, ASCE, 116, 49–73.

Ping, W. V., & Sheng, B. (2011). Developing correlation relationship between modulus of subgrade reaction and resilient modulus for Florida subgrade soils. Transportation Research Record, 2232(1), 95–107.

Pradena, M., & Houben, L. (2018). Load transfer-crack width relation of non-dowelled jointed plain concrete short slabs. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 13(1), 40–45.

Teller, L. W., & Sutherland, E. C. (1943). The structural design of concrete pavements: part 5- an experimental study of the Westergaard analysis of stress conditions in concrete pavement slabs of uniform thickness. Public Roads, 23(8), 167–212.

Westergaard, H. M. (1926). Analysis of stresses in concrete pavement due to variations of temperature. Highway Research Board, 6, 201–215.

Westergaard, H. M. (1926). Stresses in concrete pavements by theoretical analysis. Public Roads, 7, 25–35.

Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Kaya, O., Ceylan, H., & Kim, S. (2020). Investigation of longitudinal cracking in widened concrete pavements. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 15(1), 211–231.

Yoder, E. J., & Witczak, M. W. (1975). Principles of pavement design (second edition). John Wiley & sons Inc., New York, USA.

Zdiri, M., Abriak, N.-E., Ben Ouezdou, M., Loulizi, A., & Neji, J. (2009). Numerical modelling of a roller compacted concrete pavement under vehicular loading. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2(5), 188–195. Retrieved from Numerical_modeling_of_a_roller_compacted_concrete_pavement_under_ vehicular_loading




How to Cite

Olita, S., Diomedi, M., & Ciampa, D. (2020). Alternative Formula for Rigid Pavement Stress Calculation in Corner Load Conditions. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 15(5), 59-79.