Numerical Study of Road Embankment Type Action on Shear Stress Around Skewed Bridge Abutment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2022-17.581Keywords:
approach embankment, compound channel, FLOW-3D, flow pattern, guide bank, shear stressAbstract
This paper investigates the effect of different geometries of approach embankments and guides banks on the flow pattern and bed shear stress values in the skewed bridges in the compound channel using three-dimensional numerical modelling. First, the numerical model was evaluated based on the results of existing laboratory studies. After ensuring its proper performance, the elliptical guide bank and the three types of abutments: vertical-wall, spill-through, and wing-wall, at different skew angles are examined. Investigation of the values of maximum velocity and bed shear stress at the flow-conducting embankment and the flow-splitting embankment showed that in the flow-conducting embankment, the best performance is assigned to the elliptical guide bank. In contrast, the performance of various abutments is different for the flow-splitting embankment depending on the skew angle of the bridge. Then, different patterns based on streamlines for the geometry plan of the guide bank were proposed and studied. The results show that the most suitable pattern for the guide bank reduces the maximum flow velocity by up to 15% and reduces the maximum bed shear stress by up to 80% around the flow-splitting embankments.References
Ahmad, M., Ghani, U., Anjum, N., Ahmed Pasha, G., Kaleem Ullah, M., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Investigating the flow hydrodynamics in a compound channel with layered vegetated floodplains. Civil Engineering Journal, 6(5), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091513
Al-Khatib, I. A., & Dmadi, N. M. (1996). Boundary Shear Stress in Rectangular Compound Channels. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 23(1), 9–18.
Biglari, B., & Sturm, T. W. (1998). Numerical Modeling of Flow around Bridge Abutments in Compound Channel. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1998)124:2(156)
Erduran, K. S., Seckin, G., Kocaman, S., & Atabay, S. (2012). 3D Numerical Modelling of Flow Around Skewed Bridge Crossing. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 6(3), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2012.11015436
Fernandes, J. N., Leal, J. B. and Cardoso, A. H. (2012). Flow structure in a compound channel with smooth and rough floodplains. European Water, 38(1), 3–12.
Flow Science, Inc. (2008). FLOW-3D User’s Manual (Version 9.3). Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, N. M.
Kouchakzadeh, S., & Townsend, R. (1997). Maximum scour depth at bridge abutments terminating in the floodplain zone. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(6), 996–1006. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-24-6-996
Mahjoob, A., & Kilanehei, F. (2020). Effects of the skew angle and road embankment length on the hydraulic performance of bridges on compound channels. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 62(4). https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2020/v62n4a5
Mays, L. W. (2010). Water Resources Engineering. 2nd ed., Wiley, USA.
Molinas, A., Kheireldin, K., & Wu, B. (1998). Shear Stress around Vertical Wall Abutments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124(8), 822–830. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1998)124:8(822)
Morales, R., & Ettema, R. (2013). Insights from Depth-Averaged Numerical Simulation of Flow at Bridge Abutments in Compound Channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(5), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000693
Seckin, G. (2007). The effect of skewness on bridge backwater prediction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34(10), 1371–1374. https://doi.org/10.1139/l07-053
Shahhosseini, M., & Yu, G. (2019). Experimental Study on the Effects of Pier Shape and Skew Angle on Pier Scour. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1300, 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1300/1/012031
Shiono, K., & Knight, D. W. (1988, July). Two-dimensional analytical solution for a compound channel. In Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on refined flow modelling and turbulence measurements (pp. 503–510). Universal Academy Press.
Smith, H. D., & Foster, D. L. (2005). Modeling of Flow Around a Cylinder Over a Scoured Bed. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 131(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-950x(2005)131:1(14)
Vui Chua, K., Fraga, B., Stoesser, T., Ho Hong, S., & Sturm, T. (2019). Effect of Bridge Abutment Length on Turbulence Structure and Flow through the Opening. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 145(6), 04019024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001591
Wardhana, K., & Hadipriono, F. C. (2003). Analysis of Recent Bridge Failures in the United States. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 17(3), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144)
Yang, Y., Melville, B. W., Macky, G. H., & Shamseldin, A. Y. (2019). Local Scour at Complex Bridge Piers in Close Proximity under Clear-Water and Live-Bed Flow Regime. Water, 11(8), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081530
Zevenbergen, L. W., Arneson, L. A., Hunt, J. H., Miller, A. C., Ayres Associates, United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Bridge Technology, National Highway Institute (U.S.), Ayres Associates, United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Bridge Technology, & National Highway Institute (U.S.). (2012). Hydraulic Design of Safe Bridges. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, National Highway Institute.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mahdi Asadi, Fouad Kilanehei, Amir Mahjoob
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
