Connection Between Track Geometry Quality and Dynamic Vehicle Response at Various Speeds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2023-18.613Keywords:
axle box acceleration, estimation function, second spatial derivative, track geometry, vehicle response, vehicle-track forcesAbstract
Track geometry measurements are widely used for describing track quality. However, derailments and track deterioration are caused by forces arising in vehicle-track system. This research focuses on two types of vehicle response. Firstly, the influence of the longitudinal level irregularities on the vertical wheel-rail forces was examined. Secondly, the correlation between the lateral axle box acceleration and the cross level irregularities was investigated. Track geometry and vehicle response data were acquired simultaneously by a track recording car, formed from a passenger car, at various speeds up to 130 km/h. Vehicle-track forces were calculated based on accelerometers mounted on the car body, bogies and axle boxes, considering mass and moment of inertia. Non-linear regressions resulted in vertical vehicle-track force estimation functions. It was proven that the use of second spatial derivatives of the longitudinal level gave a better estimation than the use of reference TQIs according to European Standard EN 13848-6. A linear relationship was found between the speed and standard deviation of vertical vehicle-track forces. On straight sections with constant speed, correlation coefficients of around 0.8 were found between second spatial derivatives of cross level and lateral axle box acceleration.References
Ágh, C. (2018). A new arrangement of accelerometers on track inspection car FMK-007 for evaluating derailment safety. Proceedings of 23rd International Seminar “Track Maintenance Machines in Theory and Practice”, SETRAS, Žilina, Slovakia, 7–14.
Ágh, C. (2019). Comparative analysis of axle box accelerations in correlation with track geometry irregularities. Acta Technica Jaurinensis, 12(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.14513/actatechjaur.v12.n2.501
Ágh, C. (2021). Measurement distortion analysis of repetitive and isolated track geometry irregularities. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 65(3), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppci.17638
Costa, J. N., Ambrósio, J., Andrade, A. R., & Frey, D. (2023). Safety assessment using computer experiments and surrogate modeling: Railway vehicle safety and track quality indices. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 229, Article 108856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108856
Császár, L., & Pálfi, C. (2013). Determination of wheel-rail contact forces using different measurement methods. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Railway Bogies and Running Gears, Budapest, Hungary, 153–166.
Dumitriu, M., Gheți, M. A., & Cruceanu, I. C. (2020). Experimental analysis of the vertical vibration of the railway bogie during braking. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.009
El Moueddeb, M., Louf, F., Boucard, P. A., Dadié, F., Saussine, G., & Sorrentino, D. (2022). An efficient numerical model to predict the mechanical response of a railway track in the low-frequency range. Vibration, 5(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration5020019
European Committee for Standardization. (2016). EN 14363 – Railway applications – Testing and Simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles – Running Behaviour and stationary tests. Brussels, Belgium. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/56417fef-6427-4f10-ae76-e01157e2ae93/en-14363-2016
European Committee for Standardization. (2019). EN 13848-1 – Railway applications – Track – Track geometry quality – Part 1: Characterization of track geometry. Brussels, Belgium. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/19848cc1-08a5-44aa-96aa-18294c6ab12f/en-13848-1-2019
European Committee for Standardization. (2020a). EN 13848-6 – Railway applications – Track – Track geometry quality – Part 6: Characterisation of track geometry quality. Brussels, Belgium. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/9c85a71e-0f1f-4825-b983-08b9aef34d6e/en-13848-6-2014a1-2020
European Committee for Standardization. (2020b). EN 13848-2 – Railway applications – Track – Track geometry quality – Part 2: Measuring systems – Track recording vehicles. Brussels, Belgium. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/60b191d2-eb23-4b4e-b5d1-55166df8ed49/en-13848-2-2020
Haigermoser, A., Luber, B., Rauh, J., & Gräfe, G. (2015). Road and track irregularities: measurement, assessment and simulation. Vehicle System Dynamics, 53(7), 878–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2015.1037312
Hoelzl, C., Dertimanis, V., Landgraf, M., Ancu, L., Zurkirchen, M., & Chatzi, E. (2022). On-board monitoring for smart assessment of railway infrastructure: a systematic review. The Rise of Smart Cities, 223–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-817784-6.00015-1
Karis, T., Berg, M., & Stichel, S. (2020). Analysing the correlation between vehicle responses and track irregularities using dynamic simulations and measurements. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 234(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409719840450
Lee, J., Oh, K., Park, Y., & Choi, J. (2020). Study on the applicability of dynamic factor standards by comparison of spring constant based dynamic factor of ballasted and concrete track structures. Applied Sciences, 10(23), Article 8361. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238361
Li, M., Persson, I., Spännar, J., & Berg, M. (2012). On the use of second-order derivatives of track irregularity for assessing vertical track geometry quality. Vehicle System Dynamics, 50(sup1), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2012.671947
Luber, B., Haigermoser, A., & Grabner, G. (2010). Track geometry evaluation method based on vehicle response prediction. Vehicle System Dynamics, 48(sup1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423111003692914
Van Dyk, B. J., Edwards, J. R., Dersch, M. S., Ruppert Jr, C. J., & Barkan, C. P. (2017). Evaluation of dynamic and impact wheel load factors and their application in design processes. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 231(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409715619454
Vinkó, Á., Simonek, T., Ágh, C., Csikós, A., & Figura, B. (2023). Feasibility of onboard smartphones for railway track geometry estimation: sensing capabilities and characterization. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 67(1), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppci.20187
Wang, M., Yang, C., Ning, B., Li, X., & Wang, P. (2023). Influence mechanism of vertical dynamic track irregularity on train operation stability of long-span suspension bridge. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 237(8), 1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544097221148794
Weston, P., Roberts, C., Yeo, G., & Stewart, E. (2015). Perspectives on railway track geometry condition monitoring from in-service railway vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics, 53(7), 1063–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2015.1034730
Yang, Y., Liu, G., & Liu, C. (2021). Fine interrelation between track irregularities and vehicle responses: multi-scale time-dependent correlation analysis. Vehicle System Dynamics, 59(8), 1171–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2020.1741653
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Csaba Ágh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
