Bicycle Infrastructure Safety Assessment From the Perspective of Urban Development Specialists and Engineers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2024-19.644Keywords:
behavioural shifts, bicycle intersection safety, cyclist safety evaluation, engineering safety solutions, infrastructure efficacy, sustainable mobility, urban infrastructure planningAbstract
The safety of bicycle infrastructure is a primary factor influencing bicycle travel. While cyclists’ perspectives on infrastructure safety are extensively studied, they are merely the end users. Decisions on infrastructure design are made by engineers and urban development specialists. Therefore, it is crucial to determine if these professionals’ safety assessments align with those of cyclists. A qualitative survey was conducted with 5 expert engineers and 5 urban development specialists, each having 5 to 20 years of experience in transportation infrastructure planning. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance W was used to assess the compatibility of their opinions. The results showed significant compatibility: W = 0.697 for engineers and W = 0.511 for urban development specialists. Seventeen cycling infrastructure installation schemes were evaluated. Both engineers (M = 10.0, SD = 0.0) and urban development specialists (M = 9.8, SD = 0.44) indicated the DT_2 option as providing the greatest sense of security, where the bicycle path is physically separated from both the carriageway and pedestrian path. The key findings reveal agreement on the safety of straight-street segments of bicycle infrastructure but diverging opinions at intersections zones. Urban development specialists are influenced by existing practices and legal frameworks lacking detailed cycling infrastructure guidelines at intersections. Engineers align more closely with cyclists’ perceptions, emphasising physical separation and speed reduction measures. The study concludes that urban development specialists need to better understand cyclists’ needs and prioritize safer infrastructure solutions.
References
Aldred, R., Croft, J., & Goodman, A. (2019). Impacts of an active travel intervention with a cycling focus in a suburban context: One-year findings from an evaluation of London’s in-progress mini-Hollands programme. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 123, 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.018
Anastasiadou, K., & Gavanas, N. (2023). Enhancing urban public space through appropriate sustainable mobility policies. A multi-criteria analysis approach. Land Use Policy, 132, Article 106765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106765
Bell, W., & Ferretti, D. (2015). What should planners know about cycling? In J. Bonham & M. Johnson (Eds.), Cycling Futures (pp. 321–356). University of Adelaide Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.20851/j.ctt1sq5x1g.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20851/cycling-futures-15
Berghoefer, F. L., Huemer, A. K., & Vollrath, M. (2023). Look right! The influence of bicycle crossing design on drivers’ approaching behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 95, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.03.017
Bian, R., Tolford, T., Liu, S., & Gangireddy, S. (2023). Lessons learned from evaluating complete streets project outcomes with emerging data sources. Transportation Planning and Technology, 46(6), 754–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2023.2214136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2023.2214136
Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., & Kärrholm, M. (2020). Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability. Developments in the Built Environment, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100021
Blitz, A., Busch-Geertsema, A., & Lanzendorf, M. (2020). More cycling, less driving? Findings of a cycle street intervention study in the Rhine-Main metropolitan region, Germany. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030805
Brezina, T., Lemmerer, H., & Leth, U. (2022). Mental barriers in planning for cycling along the urban–rural gradient. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 16, Article 100689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100689
Deliali, K., Christofa, E., & Knodler, M. (2021). The role of protected intersections in improving bicycle safety and driver right-turning behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 159, Article 106295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106295
Erbas Melis, O., & Okumus Prini, D. (2023). Understanding Active Mobility and Micromobility in a Studentified Neighbourhood. Online Journal of Art and Design, 11, 5.
European Commission (EC). (2011). White paper 2011: Roadmap to a single European transport area – towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/ strategies/2011_white_paper_en.htm
Fitch, D. T., Carlen, J., & Handy, S. L. (2022). What makes bicyclists comfortable? Insights from a visual preference survey of casual and prospective bicyclists. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 155, 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.008
Friel, D., Wachholz, S., Werner, T., Zimmermann, L., Schwedes, O., & Stark, R. (2023). Cyclists’ perceived safety on intersections and roundabouts – A qualitative bicycle simulator study. Journal of Safety Research, 87, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.09.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.09.012
Garber, M. D., Watkins, K. E., Flanders, W. D., Kramer, M. R., Lobelo, R. L. F., Mooney, S. J., Ederer, D. J., & McCullough, L. E. (2023). Bicycle infrastructure and the incidence rate of crashes with cars: A case-control study with Strava data in Atlanta. Journal of Transport and Health, 32, Article 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101669
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Gössling, S., Humpe, A., Litman, T., & Metzler, D. (2019). Effects of perceived traffic risks, noise, and exhaust smells on bicyclist behaviour: An economic evaluation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2), Article 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020408
Gössling, S., & McRae, S. (2022). Subjectively safe cycling infrastructure: New insights for urban designs. Journal of Transport Geography, 101, Article 103340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103340
Gössling, S., Schröder, M., Späth, P., & Freytag, T. (2016). Urban space distribution and sustainable transport. Transport Reviews, 36(5), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1147101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1147101
Guo, X., Tavakoli, A., Angulo, A., Robartes, E., Chen, T. D., & Heydarian, A. (2023). Psycho-physiological measures on a bicycle simulator in immersive virtual environments: how protected/curbside bike lanes may improve perceived safety. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 92, 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.11.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.11.015
Hirsch, L., Mackie, H., Crombie, C., Bolton, L., Wilson, N., & Cornille, Z. (2022). Road user interaction changes following street improvements from Te Ara Mua – Future Streets: A case study. Journal of Transport and Health, 25, Article 101384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101384
Hossein Sabbaghian, M., Llopis-Castelló, D., & García, A. (2023). A safe infrastructure for micromobility: The current state of knowledge. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13), Article 10140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310140
Huemer, A. K., Rosenboom, L. M., Naujoks, M., & Banach, E. (2022). Testing cycling infrastructure layout in virtual environments: An examination from a bicycle rider’s perspective in simulation and online. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14, Article 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100586
Hui, N., Saxe, S., Roorda, M., Hess, P., & Miller, E. J. (2018). Measuring the completeness of complete streets. Transport Reviews, 38(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1299815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1299815
Jensen, W. A., Brown, B. B., Smith, K. R., Brewer, S. C., Amburgey, J. W., & McIff, B. (2017). Active transportation on a complete street: Perceived and audited walkability correlates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9), Article 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091014
Lanzendorf, M., Scheffler, C., Trost, L., & Werschmöller, S. (2022). Implementing bicycle-friendly transport policies: Examining the effect of an infrastructural intervention on residents’ perceived quality of urban life in Frankfurt, Germany. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2476–2485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.014
Maisel, J. L., Baek, S. R., & Choi, J. (2021). Evaluating users’ perceptions of a Main Street corridor: Before and after a Complete Street project. Journal of Transport and Health, 23, Article 101276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101276
Marquart, H., Schlink, U., & Ueberham, M. (2020). The planned and the perceived city: A comparison of cyclists’ and decision-makers’ views on cycling quality. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, Article 102602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102602
McQueen, M., Abou-Zeid, G., MacArthur, J., & Clifton, K. (2021). Transportation Transformation: Is Micromobility Making a Macro Impact on Sustainability? Journal of Planning Literature, 36(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220972696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220972696
Müggenburg, H., Blitz, A., & Lanzendorf, M. (2022). What is a good design for a cycle street? – User perceptions of safety and attractiveness of different street layouts. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(2), 1375–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.04.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.04.021
Mockus, A., & Jasiūnienė, V. (2024). The Impact of Street Humanisation on Road Safety. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 19(2), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2024-19.636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2024-19.636
National Complete Streets Coalition (2011). What are complete streets? Smart Growth America. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/complete-streets/ complete-streets-fundamentals/complete-streets-faq
Nazemi, M., van Eggermond, M. A. B., Erath, A., Schaffner, D., Joos, M., & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Studying bicyclists’ perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulator combined with immersive virtual reality. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 151, Article 105943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943
O’Reilly, R. K., Kollmann, A., Cohen, J. J., & Reichl, J. (2024). Macro-factors driving bicycle adoption as a primary transport mode across Europe. Travel Behaviour and Society, 34, Article 100669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100669
Pánek, J., & Benediktsson, K. (2017). Emotional mapping and its participatory potential: Opinions about cycling conditions in Reykjavík, Iceland. Cities, 61, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.005
Preston, A., & Pulugurtha, S. S. (2021). Simulating and assessing the effect of a protected intersection design for bicyclists on traffic operational performance and safety. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 9, Article 100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100329
Reggiani, G., Salomons, A. M., Sterk, M., Yuan, Y., O’Hern, S., Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2022). Bicycle network needs, solutions, and data collection systems: A theoretical framework and case studies. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(2), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.03.006
Rivera Olsson, S., & Elldér, E. (2023). Are bicycle streets cyclist-friendly? Micro-environmental factors for improving perceived safety when cycling in mixed traffic. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 184, Article 107007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107007
Robartes, E., Chen, E., Chen, T. D., & Ohlms, P. B. (2021). Assessment of local, state, and federal barriers to implementing bicycle infrastructure: A Virginia case study. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(2), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.02.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.02.004
Shu, S., Quiros, D. C., Wang, R., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Changes of street use and on-road air quality before and after complete street retrofit: An exploratory case study in Santa Monica, California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 32, 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.08.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.08.024
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGrawHill.
Singleton, P. A., & Poudel, N. (2023). Bicycling comfort at roundabouts: Effects of design and situational factors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 94, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.02.008
Sodiq, A., Baloch, A. A. B., Khan, S. A., Sezer, N., Mahmoud, S., Jama, M., & Abdelaal, A. (2019). Towards modern sustainable cities: Review of sustainability principles and trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.106
United Nations, 2015. World urbanization prospects. The 2014 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications
Van Cauwenberg, J., Clarys, P., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Ghekiere, A., de Geus, B., Owen, N., & Deforche, B. (2018). Environmental influences on older adults’ transportation cycling experiences: A study using bike-along interviews. Landscape and Urban Planning, 169, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.003
Vasilev, M., Pritchard, R., & Jonsson, T. (2022). Mixed-methods approach to studying multiuser perceptions of an interim Complete Streets project in Norway. Travel Behaviour and Society, 29, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.05.002
Vasilev, M., Pritchard, R., Jonsson, T., & Panek, J. (2023). An exploration of multiuser perceptions of a Norwegian Complete Streets modification using interim design strategies. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 13, Article 101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101058
Wexler, M.S., & El-Geneidy, A., 2017. Keep ’em separated: Desire lines analysis of bidirectional cycle tracks in Montreal, Canada. Transportation Research Record, 2662(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.3141/2662-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2662-12
World Health Organization (2021). Campaign launched to make 30 km/h streets the norm for cities worldwide. https://www.who.int/news/item/22-03- 2021-campaign-launched-to-make-30-km-h-streets-the-norm-for-cities- worldwide
Zabielaitė-Skirmantė, M., & Burinskienė, M. (2023). Evaluation of the methodology for determining cycling flows in Lithuania. 12th International Conference “Environmental Engineering”. https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2023.866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2023.866
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miglė Zabielaitė-Skirmantė, Marija Burinskienė (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
