Assessment of Pavement Structural Strength by the Falling Weight Deflectometer


  • Andrus Aavik Dept of Transport, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
  • Priit Paabo Baltifalt Ltd., Väo tee 30, Rae, 75303 Harju County, Estonia
  • Tiit Kaal Technical Centre of Estonian Roads Ltd., Männiku tee 123/6, 11216 Tallinn, Estonia


flexible pavement, E-modulus, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), Cobb-Douglas equation


The main objective of the research project was to derive the equation for calculating the pavement equivalent E-modulus on the basis of the Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) deflection measurement data to be used in the Estonian Pavement Management System (EPMS) for network and project level analysis so, that the determined values are comparable with the Estonian flexible pavement design procedure 2001-52. In 1999, 32 and in 2001 additional 19 FWD test sites were chosen on actual pavement structures to perform FWD measurements annually, once or twice per month from early spring until late autumn. FWD measurement data were analysed mathematically and the results were compared with the Estonian flexible pavement design procedure. The research project results in the following:

  • The quantitative methodology for evaluating the qualitative characteristics of the pavement is determined on the basis of the Cobb-Douglas equation, taking into account at a time practically an unlimited number of factors influencing the pavement structural condition.
  • The relationship between the pavement equivalent elastic modulus calculated according to the Estonian flexible pavement design procedure 2001-52 and based on the FWD measured deflection is determined. The equation for calculating of the pavement equivalent E-modulus on the basis of the FWD deflection data to be used in the EPMS is derived.

The correction factors for the pavement equivalent E-modulus, taking into account the month of the FWD measurement performance, moisture conditions and road embankment height at the FWD test site, are mathematically based on statistical data determined for Estonian conditions.


Guidelines for Flexible Pavement Design (Elastsete teekatendite projekteerimise juhend). Estonian Road Administration, Tallinn 2001. 50 p. (in Estonian) atp/failid/projekt_juh/el_katendite_juhend_variant_2.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2006.

Ullidtz, P. Modelling Flexible Pavement Response and Performance. Polyteknisk Forlag. Denmark, 1998. 205 p. ISBN 87-502-0805-5.

Guidelines for flexible pavement design (Инструкция по проектированию дорожных одежд нежесткого типа). BCH 46-83. Минтрансстрой CCCP. Moscow: Transport, 1985. 157 p. (in Russian).

Highway Design Norms and Requirements (Tee projekteerimise normid ja nõuded). Decree of the Ministry of Trans- port and Communication of the Republic of Estonia 28.09.1999, No 55, RTL 2000, 23, 303 (in Estonian). Accessed July 20, 2006.

Aavik, A. Methodical Basis for the Evaluation of Pavement Structural Strength in Estonian Pavement Management System (EPMS). Theses of Tallinn Technical University. F, Civil Engineering. ISSN 1406-4766. Tallinn, 2003. 152 p.

Definition of Cobb-Douglas Production Function. http:// cobb_douglas.htm. Accessed July 20, 2006.

Koppel, M. Mathematical Models of Condition of Tallinn Streets (Tallinna tänavate seisukorra matemaatilised mudelid). Final Report. Dept of Transportation, Tallinn University of Technology. Tallinn, 2004. 38 p. (in Estonian).




How to Cite

Aavik, A., Paabo, P., & Kaal, T. (2006). Assessment of Pavement Structural Strength by the Falling Weight Deflectometer. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 1(4), 193-199.