Probabilistic Assessment of Soil Shear Strength Parameters Using Triaxial Test Results

Jonas Amšiejus; Neringa Dirgėlienė

Probabilistic Assessment of Soil Shear Strength Parameters Using Triaxial Test Results

Authors

Jonas Amšiejus Dept of Geotechnical Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al.11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
Neringa Dirgėlienė Dept of Geotechnical Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al.11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Keywords:

triaxial test, soil strength, probabilistic assessment, reliability index, design values, margin of resistance

Abstract

According to the currently valid standards, bearing resistance can be calculated applying direct informationalstatistic method which includes probabilistic models of margin of resistance Z = R – E. Probabilistic methods allow to determine the influence of which design condition argument on the uncertainty of margin of bearing resistance is the greatest. That enables to project the directions of further investigations. The greatest influence on the uncertainty of margin of bearing resistance is made by the tangent of angle of internal friction and cohesion. Therefore it is required that these strength parameters should be determined more exactly. This would enable to achieve the economy of materials and labour expenditures for the construction of foundation without decreasing reliability of ground. In order to estimate the soil strength parameters more exactly, some changes in the triaxial test apparatus have been made so that the sample base has been allowed to move freely in the horizontal direction. Several experiments have been carried out by improved triaxial test apparatus. It has been determined that the values of the tangent of angle of internal friction and cohesion have been less by 10,8 % and 43 % respectively for dense sand samples with free horizontal base movement than those determined for samples with restricted horizontal movements of ends (regular ends). Foundation width B calculated according to the parameters of residual shearing strength, determined by usual triaxial test apparatus, is smaller by 23 % than that calculated according to the data obtained in the improved triaxial test apparatus. Reliability index of bearing resistance for a sample with regular ends calculated according to the residual values of soil shearing strength parameters by means of first order probabilistic methods for design approach 3 is β = 4,4.

References

Užpolevičius, B. Investigation, testing and evaluation of construction Works (Statinių tyrinėjimas, bandymas ir vertinimas). Vilnius: Technika, 2006. 135 p. (in Lithuanian).

EN 1990:2002. Basis of Structural Design. European Standards. Brussels, CEN, 2002. 87 p.

STR 2.05.03:2003. Basis of Structural Design for Buildings. Desigh Code of Lithuanian Respublic (STR 2.05.03:2003. Statybinių konstrukcijų projektavimo pagrindai) Vilnius: Lithuanian Dept of Environment, 2003. 63 p. (in Lithuanian).

Amšiejus, J. Analysis of methods for determining soil shear strength design. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management (Statyba), 2000, Vol 6, No 2, p. 120–127 (in Lithuanian).

Užpolevičius, B.; Amšiejus, J. Pecularity and practical use of direct informational-statistical standards for design and assessment of structures and foundations. In Transactions of Theoretical Foundations of Civil Engineering, Warsaw, May 2007, p. 677–686.

Goldshtein, M. N. Mechanical properties of soil (Механические свойства грунта). Moscow: Strojizdat, 1971. 366 p. (in Russian).

Sun, H.; Chen, J. F.; Ge, X. R. Deformation characteristic of silty clay subjected to triaxial loading by computerised tomography. Geotechnique, 2004, Vol 54, No 5, p. 307–314.

Otani, J.; Mukunoki, T.; Yoshimura, M. Development of new triaxial compression test apparatus for geomaterials on industrial X-ray CT scanner. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Istanbul, 27–31 Aug 2001, p. 231–234.

Head, K. H. Manual of soil laboratory testing. Vol 3: Effective Stress Tests. London, 1986, p. 743–1238.

Lade, P. V.; Wasif, U. Effects of height-to-diameter ratio in triaxial specimens on the behaviour of cross-anisotropic sand. In Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock. Philadelphia, 1988, p. 706–714.

Goto, S.; Tatsuoka, F. Effects of end conditions on triaxial compressive strength for cohesionless soil. In Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock. Philadelphia, 1988, p. 692–705.

Airey, D. W. Finite element analyses of triaxial tests with different end and drainage conditions. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Vol 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1991, p. 225–230.

Jeremic, B.; Yang, Z.; Sture, S. Numerical assessment of the influence of end conditions on constitutive behaviour of geomaterials. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, June 2004, Vol 130, No 6, p. 741–745.

Peric, D.; Su, S. Influence of the end friction on the response of triaxial and plane strain clay samples. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, 12–16 Sept 2005, p. 571–574.

Hinokio M.; Nakai, T. Numerical analysis of localized deformations in clay specimens sing subloading tij model. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, 12–16 Sept 2005, p. 909–912.

Sheng, D.; Westerberg, B.; Mattsson, H.; Axelsson, K. Effects of end restraint and strain rate in triaxial tests. Computers and Geotechnics, 1997, Vol 21, No 3, p. 163–182.

Verveckaitė, N.; Amšiejus, J.; Stragys, V. Stressstrain analysis in soil sample during laboratory testing. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2007, Vol 13, No 1, p. 63–70.

Dirgėlienė, N.; Amšiejus, J.; Stragys, V. Effect of ends restraint on soil shear strength parameters during triaxial. In Transactions of Theoretical Foundations of Civil Engineering, Warsaw, May 2007, p. 151–156.

prEN 1997-1. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design – Part 1: General rules. Brussels, CEN, 2004. 167 p.

Užpolevičius, B. Probabilistic and statistical methods for design and analysing limit states. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management (Statyba), 2001, Vol 7, No 5, p. 413–418 (in Lithuanian).

Marek, P.; Brozzetti, J.; Gustar, M. Probabilistic assessment of structures using Monte Carlo simulation. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2001. 471 p.

Cardoso, A. S.; Fernandes, M. M. Characteristic values of ground parameters and probability of failure in design according to Eurocode 7. Geotechnique, 2001,Vol 51, No 6, p. 519–531.